Now days eating habits of folks way they live their life plays an important role for this topic some people say it is the part of Authority to see how the Civilians are living however other think office their choices they have rise to make any kind of resolution there for ahead of my preference both the sides should be understood. Discussing the Former view point, the proponents State that most importantly, It can be beneficial for all people if the authority would make laws regarding what kind of foods each person have to consume this can also resulted into less medical insurance and facilities besides this mostly individuals are scared of her penalty in simple words losing some sort of money can increase them to eat and have a healthy lifestyle moreover government can bend some kind of foods that is toxic for the body for example frozen food junk food and sugary drinks. On the contrary, those who stand by the latter opinion have their own claims. The supporters biggest argument is That not everything can be controlled by the laws and regulation this can give bad Effects on each person further more some food items are mostly people once when they have any kind of difficulties in their life it has been proven by research and survey that people munch on desert more when their stress level is high. To sum up and Of a foolish and I support the 1st to you to a large extent the practical purpose of controlling eating habits can give a good health
Now
days eating habits of folks way they
live
their life plays an
important
role for this topic
some
people
say it is the part of Authority to
see
how the Civilians are living
however
other
think
office their choices they have rise to
make
any
kind
of resolution there for ahead of my preference both the sides should
be understood
. Discussing the Former view point, the proponents State that most
importantly
, It can be beneficial for all
people
if the authority would
make
laws regarding what
kind
of
foods
each person
have to
consume this can
also
resulted
into less medical insurance and facilities
besides
this
mostly
individuals
are scared
of her penalty in simple words losing
some
sort of money can increase them to eat and have a healthy lifestyle
moreover
government
can bend
some
kind
of
foods
that is
toxic for the body
for example
frozen
food
junk
food
and sugary drinks.
On the contrary
, those who stand by the latter opinion have their
own
claims. The supporters
biggest
argument is That not everything can
be controlled
by the laws and regulation this can give
bad
Effects on each person
further
more
some
food
items are
mostly
people
once when they have any
kind
of difficulties in their life it has
been proven
by research and survey that
people
munch on desert more when their
stress
level is high. To sum up and Of a foolish and I support the 1st to you to a large extent the practical purpose of controlling eating habits can give a
good
health