Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people strongly oppose animal experimentation, believing that it causes pain to animals, while some other people consider it necessary. What is your opinion?

Some people strongly oppose animal experimentation, believing that it causes pain to animals, while some other people consider it necessary. What is your opinion? XyE8E

No subject in modern society is as controversial as animal-based experiments. While a number of people criticize animal testing and believe they merit humane treatment, I am of the opinion that these tests are essential to the well-being of both human beings and that of animals. First of all, there is little doubt that many experiments make huge contributions to technology developments, and to date, there is little chance of finding an alternative approach. Indeed, animals are often used in health care and to increase life expectancy since they bear a striking resemblance to humans, either in cell structure or in behaviors. To be more specific, they respond to external disturbances such as electrical shock nearly in the same manner as humans do. As a result, these tests become the main approach to anticipate risks when new products or drugs are prepared as medicine for humans. Another fact supports animal-based experiments is that animals are not equivalent to humans and they can be utilized as resources for humans’ sake. Obviously, animals have no capacity to take into consideration the rights and interests of other species, which is the reason why they feed on each other. Humans, on the other hand, conduct animal testing not only for their own sake but also for the benefit of other species. For instance, multiple medical achievements are applied in veterinary surgeries to give medical treatment and medicine to sick animals. Despite the justification given for vivisection, scientists have obligations to reduce animal testing as well as their suffering. In fact, there is a growing recognition that the majority of these tests are being exploited for commercial purposes. For example, the cosmetic industry is diversifying products and maximizing profits by slaughtering numerous animals. However, this circumstance can be ceased only if scientists do not abuse their power by conducting cruel experiments for unessential objectives. In summary, one can subscribe to the notion that animals are resources intended for the sake of humanity, although it is certain that suffering should be controlled to the minimum during experimentation.

No subject in modern society is as controversial as animal-based You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsearchprobeattemptobservationundertakingstudy
experiments
. While a number of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 criticize You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 testing and believe they merit You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsympatheticcordialgenerousbenevolentopen-mindedhumanitarian
humane
 treatment, I am of the opinion that these This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evaluates
tests
 are essential to the well-being of both You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 beings and that of animals.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".First
First of all
, there is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
little
 doubt that This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsearchprobeattemptobservationundertakingstudy
experiments
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 huge contributions to technology developments, and to date, there is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
little
 chance of finding an alternative approach. Indeed
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:frequently
often
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 in health care and to increase life expectancy since they bear a striking resemblance to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
, either in cell structure or in behaviors. To be more specific, they respond to external disturbances such as electrical shock nearly
 in the same manner as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 do. As a result
, these This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evaluates
tests
 become the main approach to anticipate This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardsdangers
risks
 when new products or drugs are prepared
 as medicine for humans.

Another fact supports animal-based You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsearchprobeattemptobservationundertakingstudy
experiments
 is that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are not equivalent to Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).humans, and
humans and
 they can be utilized
 as resources for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans’
 sake. Obviously
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 have no capacity to take into consideration the rights and interests of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 species, which is the reason why they feed on each You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
Humans
, on the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 hand, conduct You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 testing not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 for their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
 sake This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
 for the benefit of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 species. For instance
, multiple medical achievements are applied
 in veterinary surgeries to give medical treatment and medicine to sick animals.

Despite the justification This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 for vivisection, scientists have obligations to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviate
reduce
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 testing as well
 as their suffering. In fact, there is a growing recognition that the majority of these This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evaluates
tests
 are being exploited
 for commercial purposes. For example
, the cosmetic industry is diversifying products and maximizing profits by slaughtering numerous You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
. However
, this circumstance can be ceased
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 if scientists do not abuse their power by conducting cruel You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsearchprobeattemptobservationundertakingstudy
experiments
 for unessential objectives.

In summary, one can subscribe to the notion that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are resources intended for the sake of humanity, although it is certain that suffering should be controlled
 to the minimum during experimentation. 