Recently, the phenomenon of " some people see prisons as the place where criminals should be punished, while some people think their primary function should be to teach them how to lead better lives" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that punishing criminals might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the rehabilitation can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, the primary function of prisons as teaching criminals how to lead better lives can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that teaching criminals and the punishment are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of prisons. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both returning to normal life and the rehabilitation distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, prisons as the place where criminals should be punished might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of increasing crime rates. Moreover, fundamental aspects of criminals' aims can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of self-esteem can pertain to spending time in prisons. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of prisons were correlated positively with teaching a skill, the local authorities would ultimately address motivations. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of eliminating prisons.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support the idea that the merits of prisons as teaching criminals how to lead better lives far outweigh its downsides.
Recently, the phenomenon of
"
;
some
people
see
prisons
as the place where
criminals
should
be punished
, while
some
people
think
their primary function should be to teach them how to lead better
lives"
; and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas
many
people
are debating the proposition that punishing
criminals
might be
remarkably
fruitful, such issue
is regarded
thoroughly
both constructive and
positive
by a remarkable number of individuals. I
am inclined
to believe that the rehabilitation can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, the primary function of
prisons
as
teaching
criminals
how to lead better
lives
can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that
teaching
criminals
and the punishment are
inextricably
bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of
prisons
.
Thus
, invaluable ramifications of both returning to normal life and the rehabilitation
distinctly
can
be observed
.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt,
prisons
as the place where
criminals
should
be punished
might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of increasing crime rates.
Moreover
, fundamental aspects of criminals' aims can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of self-esteem can pertain to spending time in
prisons
. As a tangible example,
some
scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of
prisons
were correlated
positively
with
teaching
a
skill
, the local authorities would
ultimately
address motivations.
Hence
, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of eliminating prisons.
To conclude
, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support the
idea
that the merits of
prisons
as
teaching
criminals
how to lead better
lives
far outweigh its downsides.