It is always argued by many that the vast majority of individuals and including me believe that adding more and more sport activities in society would be a better method to increase people’s wishes to be healthy, while others think that this might have minimal result on public health, other way are demanded instead. In the following essay, both opposing views will be analyzed before reaching a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, it is believed that the best solution to improve public health is by providing a number of sport facilities, for example, athletic fields, basketball halls or football grounds in residential areas which would trigger the residents in doing some exercises. In other words, when people do physical exercises, a number of diseases which can be caused by unhealthy life styles, such as heart attack, diabetics or obesity would be reduced. As a result, the proportion of healthy individuals can be increased and the government may have to be responsible for people’s health.
On the other hand, I think that the government should put up higher taxes on fast food restaurants or cafés which would be less expensive but more productive ways of being healthy. To clarify, most of populations of the world always suffer from unhealthy died or life style due to eating fast foods such as hamburgers, pizzas or hotdogs which can be negative influence on people’s health by chemicals like cholesterol that can be cause to obesity. However, if government increases the tax for harmful meals, it may force those restaurants to prepare healthy diets and then people might eat these kinds of diets. As a result, people may not suffer from such diseases. Take the Japanese as an example, the proportion of population of Japan who aged over 60 equal to 28% of all Japanese owing to healthy diet.
In conclusion, after having both views, providing sport facilities may not be the best solution to be healthy. However, I do believe that by putting up taxes on fast food government might have a good result to deter unhealthy people.
It is always argued by
many
that the vast majority of individuals and including me believe that adding more and more sport activities in society would be a better method to increase
people’s
wishes to be
healthy
, while others
think
that this might have minimal
result
on public health,
other
way
are demanded
instead
. In the following essay, both opposing views will
be analyzed
before
reaching a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, it
is believed
that the best solution to
improve
public health is by providing a number of sport facilities,
for example
, athletic fields, basketball halls or football grounds in residential areas which would trigger the residents in doing
some
exercises. In
other
words, when
people
do physical exercises, a number of diseases which can
be caused
by unhealthy life styles, such as heart attack, diabetics or obesity would be
reduced
. As a
result
, the proportion of
healthy
individuals can
be increased
and the
government
may
have to
be responsible for
people’s
health.
On the
other
hand, I
think
that the
government
should put up higher taxes on
fast
food restaurants or cafés which would be less expensive
but
more productive ways of being
healthy
. To clarify,
most of populations
of the world always suffer from unhealthy
died
or life style due to eating
fast
foods such as hamburgers, pizzas or
hotdogs
which can be
negative
influence on
people’s
health by chemicals like cholesterol that can
be cause
to obesity.
However
, if
government
increases the tax for harmful meals, it may force those restaurants to prepare
healthy
diets and then
people
might eat these kinds of diets. As a
result
,
people
may not suffer from such diseases. Take the Japanese as an example, the proportion of population of Japan who aged over 60 equal to 28% of all Japanese owing to
healthy
diet.
In conclusion
, after having both views, providing sport facilities may not be the best solution to be
healthy
.
However
, I do believe that by putting up taxes on
fast
food
government
might have a
good
result
to deter unhealthy
people
.