There is a general notion among many proponents of university education, that it should be provided free or cost, only to the younger pupils who score the highest score in examinations. Whereas, there is also a group of people who do not iterate the above point of view, and generally stand in favour, of making university education available to all, irrespective of marks scored and applicant age. In this essay, we will critically examine both the viewpoints.
Firstly, making academic performance as a sole criteria for university selection, will definitely result in a educationally focused diaspora, as the pupils selected will be more academically inclined. Secondly, the whole scheme of selection, especially in case of those colleges, which receive a lot of applications, will be more streamlined. Thirdly, this kind of selection will result in producing a future workforce, who have proven their competency in the past, and therefore would be more professionally focused and equipped. According to the proponents of this scheme of selection, pupils who had proven their mettle in the past, will get a fair chance at the college education, and with respect to the mentioned advantages, will help weed out the not so serious candidates.
University education is a basic need, and is very much sought after, especially among the youth, who aspire to land a high paying job, which in turn would help them get settled in life. Basing the eligibility criteria, on marks scored during school years, will result in exclusion of a vast majority of students, which in turn will lead to a lot of dissatisfied youth, vying for a meaningful means of employment. The school curriculum is very general and does not cater to individual competencies. University education is more specific and an aspirant will have chances to score better and prove his mettle. Hence, basing the admissions on marks scored and age, would be a big injustice to all future aspirants.
To sum this topic up, we have to balance both the point of views, keeping in mind the current job scenario and competition among the peers for employment. Although the first point of view is theoretically sound and may produce academically brighter results, however, we have to keep in mind the practical scheme of things, before coming to a conclusion. It is impossible to restrict human aspirations, specifically those of students aspiring for a degree, basis school grades. To be fair, to one and all, we should stand by the second viewpoint and be a proponent of free and fair universal education
There is a general notion among  
many
 proponents of  
university
  education
, that it should  
be provided
 free or cost,  
only
 to the younger pupils  
who
 score the highest score in examinations. Whereas, there is  
also
 a group of  
people
  who
 do not iterate the above point of view, and  
generally
 stand in  
favour
, of making  
university
  education
 available to all, irrespective of marks scored and applicant age. In this essay, we will  
critically
 examine both the viewpoints. 
Firstly
, making academic performance as a sole  
criteria
 for  
university
  selection
, will definitely  
result
 in  
a
  educationally
 focused diaspora, as the pupils selected will be more  
academically
 inclined.  
Secondly
, the whole scheme of  
selection
,  
especially
 in case of those colleges, which receive  
a lot of
 applications, will be more streamlined.  
Thirdly
, this kind of  
selection
 will  
result
 in producing a future workforce,  
who
 have proven their competency in the past, and  
therefore
 would be more  
professionally
 focused and equipped. According to the proponents of this scheme of  
selection
, pupils  
who
 had proven their mettle in the past, will  
get
 a  
fair
 chance at the college  
education
, and with respect to the mentioned advantages, will  
help
 weed out the not  
so
 serious candidates.
University  
education
 is a basic need, and is  
very
 much sought after,  
especially
 among the youth,  
who
 aspire to land a high paying job, which in turn would  
help
 them  
get
 settled in life. Basing the eligibility criteria, on marks scored during school years, will  
result
 in exclusion of a vast majority of students, which in turn will lead to  
a lot of
 dissatisfied youth, vying for a meaningful means of employment. The school curriculum is  
very
 general and does not cater to individual competencies.  
University
  education
 is more specific and an aspirant will have chances to score better and prove his mettle.  
Hence
, basing the admissions on marks scored and age, would be a  
big
 injustice to all future aspirants.
To sum this topic up, we  
have to
 balance both the point of views, keeping in mind the  
current
 job scenario and competition among the peers for employment. Although the  
first
 point of view is  
theoretically
 sound and may produce  
academically
 brighter  
results
,  
however
, we  
have to
  keep
 in mind the practical scheme of things,  
before
 coming to a conclusion. It is impossible to restrict human aspirations,  
specifically
 those of students aspiring for a degree, basis school grades. To be  
fair
, to one and all, we should stand by the second viewpoint and be a proponent of free and  
fair
 universal  
education