It is widely argued whether state organizations or citizens should take care of keeping cities tidy and litter-free. Some people believe that this duty should fall under the governmental control, however, others expect individuals to take care of this problem. This essay suggests that, though both points of views have a right to exist, streets should be kept in order by state-paid organizations. This essay will discusss both opinions.
On the one hand, some people say that people who inhabit the streets should be responsible for their cleanliness. Since citizens take care of their apartments, gardens and balconies, they can as well be responsible for streets neatness by not littering and keeping things tidy. This point of view may be based on the fact that if each one of us starts cleaning by themselves, there will be nothing left to clean for state-owned companies. For example, kids in Russia are tought from the very early age that it is rude and bad to litter and leave dirty things on the streets. As a result, there are no cleaning crews in my country to take care of messy streets, because average citizens keep them in a neat order.
On the other hand, it is believed that the streets cleanliness should be under governmental umbrella of responsibility. State should accept this duty alongside such duties as building maintenance, trash disposal and recycling, etc. The reason behind it is the fact that citizens pay taxes, housing fees and accommodation duties that should cover payroll of cleaning professionals. For instance, real estate management companies in Dubai cover keeping buildings and streets around the buildings clean, tidy and neat as a part of the housing service they provide.
To sum up, though both points of view have their ground for existance, this essay agrees that the task of keeping the right level of cleanliness on the streets should fall in state care and individuals should not be burdened with this duty.
It is
widely
argued whether state organizations or
citizens
should take
care
of keeping cities tidy and litter-free.
Some
people
believe that this
duty
should fall under the governmental control,
however
, others
expect
individuals to take
care
of this problem. This essay suggests that, though both points of views have a right to exist,
streets
should be
kept
in order by state-paid organizations. This essay will
discusss
both opinions.
On the one hand,
some
people
say that
people
who inhabit the
streets
should be responsible for their cleanliness. Since
citizens
take
care
of their apartments, gardens and balconies, they can
as well
be responsible for
streets
neatness by not littering and keeping things tidy. This point of view may
be based
on the fact that if each one of us
starts
cleaning by themselves, there will be nothing
left
to clean for state-
owned
companies
.
For example
, kids in Russia are
tought
from the
very
early age that it is rude and
bad
to litter and
leave
dirty things on the
streets
.
As a result
, there are no cleaning crews in my country to take
care
of messy
streets
,
because
average
citizens
keep
them in a neat order.
On the other hand
, it
is believed
that the
streets
cleanliness should be under governmental umbrella of responsibility. State should accept this
duty
alongside such
duties
as building maintenance, trash disposal and recycling, etc. The reason behind it is the fact that
citizens
pay taxes, housing fees and accommodation
duties
that should cover payroll of cleaning professionals.
For instance
, real estate management
companies
in Dubai cover keeping buildings and
streets
around the buildings clean, tidy and neat as a part of the housing service they provide.
To sum up, though both points of view have their ground for
existance
, this essay
agrees
that the task of keeping the right level of cleanliness on the
streets
should fall in state
care
and individuals should not
be burdened
with this
duty
.