In recent times, there is a school of thought that students are acquiring just theoretical knowledge and there is no practical aspect of it during there entire tenure of formal education. In my opinion, I opine with this line of thought but not everything can be explained using practical.
On the one hand, there are few subjects learning which are predominantly for building analytical skills and knowledge. For example, the theories of the history subjects cannot be explained practically and are meant only to gain knowledge. Moreover, topics related to logical reasoning are meant to build problem-solving capabilities.
On the other hand, practical experience is far more important. Firstly, theory without practical application is a half-knowledge which is very dangerous. Bookish learning will definitely help, but the reality is far and few between. For instance, a biological student having just know-how skills will not be able to understand other complication while performing his first operation.
Further, there is a huge gap between learning and application. It does not correlate that school knowledge can be directly applied in the field of work. There are many other nuances while applying the bookish knowledge on the ground. To illustrate, organizations practically trains there fresh graduate hires before deploying them on real-time projects.
To sum up, it is impractical to have hands-on in certain areas which are only to gain knowledge. However, I am of the firm view that in order to achieve success, rigorous experiments need to be performed along with a thorough understanding of the core subject.
In recent times, there is a school of
thought
that students are acquiring
just
theoretical
knowledge
and there is no practical aspect of it during there entire tenure of formal education. In my opinion, I opine with this line of
thought
but
not everything can be
explained
using practical.
On the one hand, there are few subjects learning which are
predominantly
for building analytical
skills
and
knowledge
.
For example
, the theories of the history subjects cannot be
explained
practically
and
are meant
only
to gain
knowledge
.
Moreover
, topics related to logical reasoning
are meant
to build problem-solving capabilities.
On the other hand
, practical experience is far more
important
.
Firstly
, theory without practical application is a half-knowledge which is
very
dangerous
. Bookish learning will definitely
help
,
but
the reality is far and few between.
For instance
, a biological student having
just
know-how
skills
will not be able to understand other complication while performing his
first
operation.
Further
, there is a huge gap between learning and application. It does not correlate that school
knowledge
can be
directly
applied in the field of work. There are
many
other nuances while applying the bookish
knowledge
on the ground. To illustrate, organizations
practically
trains there fresh graduate hires
before
deploying them on real-time projects.
To sum up, it is impractical to have hands-on in certain areas which are
only
to gain
knowledge
.
However
, I am of the firm view that in order to achieve success, rigorous experiments need to
be performed
along with a thorough understanding of the core subject.