There is no doubt that practical exposure is as important as theoretical knowledge. A number of people think that much time is devoted to teaching the facts instead of focusing on hands-on experience in all phases of learning, whether it is school or college. I completely agree with the statement and in this essay I will support my view with valid arguments and examples.
Most of the institutes follow conventional method of teaching which includes reading, learning and writing. By this method, children can only recall concepts for a limited amount of time and when it is time to apply that knowledge at work they have forgotten it. Consequently, many students who have degrees in physics or electronics cannot even change bulbs. Likewise, many MBAs cannot fill out a tax form. All of these point to the shortcomings of a system of learning that focuses only on theory.
Another example of this is that the current curriculum does not have an equal number of theory and practical classes. To illustrate, while I had one lecture each day on the theoretical aspects of computers), there was only 1 laboratory session in the whole week. Due to this improper division, I could not practice everything being taught and hence lacked proper understanding of the concepts. If we had equal proportion of theory and practical classes, I would have gained better skills and confidence. A recent study by the educational department of New Delhi has shown that youngsters who were shown experiments were able to memorize and retain the information for a longer period of time then the ones who read it.
To conclude, I agree with the argument that much time is being spent on cramming instead of experimental learning because of the current structure of teaching. Unfortunately, this overemphasis on theory prevents / stops students from acquiring real world skills. 
There is no doubt that practical exposure is as  
important
 as theoretical knowledge. A number of  
people
  think
 that much  
time
  is devoted
 to teaching the facts  
instead
 of focusing on hands-on experience in all phases of  
learning
, whether it is school or college. I completely  
agree
 with the statement and in this essay I will support my view with valid arguments and examples.
Most of the institutes follow conventional method of teaching which includes reading,  
learning
 and writing. By this method, children can  
only
 recall concepts for a limited amount of  
time
 and when it is  
time
 to apply that knowledge at work they have forgotten it.  
Consequently
,  
many
 students who have degrees in physics or electronics cannot even  
change
 bulbs.  
Likewise
,  
many
  MBAs
 cannot fill out a tax form. All of these point to the shortcomings of a system of  
learning
 that focuses  
only
 on theory.
Another example of this is that the  
current
 curriculum does not have an equal number of theory and practical classes. To illustrate, while I had one lecture each day on the theoretical aspects of computers 
)
, there was  
only
 1 laboratory session in the whole week. Due to this improper division, I could not practice everything  
being taught
 and  
hence
 lacked proper understanding of the concepts. If we had equal proportion of theory and practical classes, I would have gained better  
skills
 and confidence. A recent study by the educational department of New Delhi has shown that youngsters who  
were shown
 experiments were able to memorize and retain the information for a longer period of  
time
 then the ones who read it. 
To conclude
, I  
agree
 with the argument that much  
time
 is  
being spent
 on cramming  
instead
 of experimental  
learning
  because
 of the  
current
 structure of teaching. Unfortunately, this overemphasis on theory  
prevents
 /  
stops
 students from acquiring real world  
skills
.