Currently, economic growth appears to become the major topic, which is forcing the government and population to ponder about. There are supporters of the idea that such a flourishing economy is the only solution to issues like starving and poverty, whereas others are against it since it can be risky for the nature surrounding us. While it is certainly true that an economic upswing can put an end to such mentioned problems, I believe that the environment is also harmed by a thriving economy as well.
On the one hand, should the countries achieve sustainable economic prosperity, this spontaneously will affect positively the lifestyle of their inhabitants. In other words, being industrially advanced enables states to provide their citizens materially since they would not depend on foreign supply. This can also stem from contraction of unemployment as manufacturing areas create more additional jobs and the population will be able to stay self-sufficient, at least with staple foods. As a result, countries get out of the circle of poverty and hunger.
On the other hand, as the states develop economically, environmental degradation will increase. That is to say, expanding industrial zones results in a growth of discharging chemical waste. The rise in carbon footprint not only can be a detrimental trouble to nature but also even to life on earth. To introduce, ozone layer depletion, which is mostly caused by toxic waste produced in such manufacturing areas, weakens protection from ultraviolet rays or melting icebergs can be a reason for raising the level of water that has an implication for flooding in some cities. Therefore, life on earth is getting worse.
The conclusion to be drawn is that the influence of economic growth of states addresses problems of hunger and destitution, and, at the same time, it can be ground for ecological issues. Should this economic upturn be sustainable not only for the peoples’ status but also for that of the environment, in my view, it ought to be conducted. 
 Currently
,  
economic
 growth appears to become the major topic, which is forcing the  
government
 and population to ponder about. There are supporters of the  
idea
 that such a flourishing economy is the  
only
 solution to issues like starving and poverty, whereas others are against it since it can be risky for the nature surrounding us. While it is  
certainly
 true that an  
economic
 upswing can put an  
end
 to such mentioned problems, I believe that the environment is  
also
 harmed by a thriving economy  
as well
.
On the one hand, should the countries achieve sustainable  
economic
 prosperity, this  
spontaneously
 will affect  
positively
 the lifestyle of their inhabitants.  
In other words
, being  
industrially
 advanced enables states to provide their citizens  
materially
 since they would not depend on foreign supply. This can  
also
 stem from contraction of unemployment as manufacturing areas create more additional jobs and the population will be able to stay self-sufficient, at least with staple foods.  
As a result
, countries  
get
 out of the circle of poverty and hunger. 
On the other hand
, as the states develop  
economically
, environmental degradation will increase.  
That is
 to say, expanding industrial zones results in a growth of discharging chemical waste. The rise in carbon footprint not  
only
 can be a detrimental trouble to nature  
but
  also
 even to life on earth. To introduce, ozone layer depletion, which is  
mostly
 caused by toxic waste produced in such manufacturing areas, weakens protection from ultraviolet rays or melting icebergs can be a reason for raising the level of water that has an implication for flooding in  
some
 cities.  
Therefore
, life on earth is getting worse.
The conclusion to  
be drawn
 is that the influence of  
economic
 growth of states addresses problems of hunger and destitution, and, at the same time, it can  
be ground
 for ecological issues. Should this  
economic
 upturn be sustainable not  
only
 for the peoples’ status  
but
  also
 for that of the environment, in my view, it ought to  
be conducted
.