With technological advances today, some people say that digital books will take over traditional newspapers and magazines. Though arguably that modernization due to advancements is inevitable, I completely oppose this idea.
First, the classical prints are easy to share. People can effortlessly access the periodicals by simply handing them over after they have read them. The public library, for example, the community can borrow books, broadsheets, or any journals. Borrowers just need to sign out and log the borrowed items.
In addition, printed sheets are better for optical health. The use of technological devices such as Ebooks emits UltraViolet rays which is extremely harmful for the eyes. Prolonged use of these electric gadgets may lead to eye strain and frequent exposure can pose a major visual disturbance or disability that will be detrimental to one’s eye health.
Meanwhile, the older generation who are less technological savvy are widely known for reading prints. They may find the electronic gadgets difficult to operate. Moreover, failure to adapt to high-tech innovations comes hand in hand with old age. These devices may seem to look like paper prints but do not function as one because users need to figure out how to navigate and have the reading material available.
In conclusion, the continuous improvements on technological gadgets is not a substitute to the conventional and well-established printed newspapers and magazines. Until there is a digital library that allows readers to share easily, as far as the gadgets are emitting harmful rays, and until innovation can make electronic books more satisfying for the readers, then technology will succeed in taking over the old-fashioned way of reading. 
With  
technological
 advances  
today
,  
some
  people
 say that digital books will take over traditional newspapers and magazines. Though  
arguably
 that modernization due to advancements is inevitable, I completely oppose this  
idea
. 
First
, the classical prints are easy to share.  
People
 can  
effortlessly
 access the periodicals by  
simply
 handing them over after they have read them. The public library,  
for example
, the community can borrow books, broadsheets, or any journals. Borrowers  
just
 need to  
sign
 out and log the borrowed items. 
In addition
, printed sheets are better for optical health. The  
use
 of  
technological
 devices such as  
Ebooks
 emits  
UltraViolet
 rays which is  
extremely
 harmful for the eyes. Prolonged  
use
 of these electric  
gadgets
 may lead to eye strain and frequent exposure can pose a major visual disturbance or disability that will be detrimental to one’s eye health.
Meanwhile, the older generation who are less  
technological
 savvy are  
widely
 known for reading prints. They may find the electronic  
gadgets
 difficult to operate.  
Moreover
, failure to adapt to high-tech innovations  
comes
 hand in hand with  
old
 age. These devices may seem to look like paper prints  
but
 do not function as one  
because
 users need to figure out how to navigate and have the reading material available. 
In conclusion
, the continuous improvements on  
technological
  gadgets
 is not a substitute to the conventional and well-established printed newspapers and magazines. Until there is a digital library that  
allows
 readers to share  
easily
, as far as the  
gadgets
 are emitting harmful rays, and until innovation can  
make
 electronic books more satisfying for the readers, then technology will succeed in taking over the  
old
-fashioned way of reading.