I agree, to prevent heinous crimes like rape and murder, criminals should be given the death penalty, but others say that, it should be a life long sentence. In this essay, I will illustrate both sides of the argument with suitable examples.
Firstly, those who support the death penalty as a mode of punishment believe that, it will instill fear into the minds of criminals. For instance, in countries like Saudi Arabia that endorses capital punishment for serious crimes, have seen a drastic decrease in rape incidents. Moreover, a death penalty will save taxpayers money, which will otherwise be utilized for the safe keeping of the criminal in jail.
On the other hand, some people argue that, the Government or any other agencies do not have the right to take the life of a person. Therefore the only viable option is to go for life long sentence. For example, in many Scandinavian countries, capital punishments are completely abolished, since they believe it's not in their power to take another man's life. Moreover, a life sentence will give the criminal a chance to deliberate the bad choices, and he/she could become a reformed person.
To conclude, the debate over death penalty versus life sentence will remain one of the controversial topics. There are pros and cons to both sides of the story, and the decision to go with one of these punishments will depend on the belief system of a country.
I
agree
, to
prevent
heinous crimes like rape and murder,
criminals
should be
given
the death
penalty
,
but
others say that, it should be a
life
long
sentence
. In this essay, I will illustrate both sides of the argument with suitable examples.
Firstly
, those who support the death
penalty
as a mode of
punishment
believe that, it will instill fear into the minds of
criminals
.
For instance
, in countries like Saudi Arabia that endorses capital
punishment
for serious crimes, have
seen
a drastic decrease in rape incidents.
Moreover
, a death
penalty
will save taxpayers money, which will
otherwise
be utilized
for the safe keeping of the
criminal
in jail.
On the other hand
,
some
people
argue that, the
Government
or any other agencies do not have the right to take the
life
of a person.
Therefore
the
only
viable option is to go for
life
long
sentence
.
For example
, in
many
Scandinavian countries, capital
punishments
are completely abolished, since they believe it's not in their power to take another
man
's
life
.
Moreover
, a
life
sentence
will give the
criminal
a chance to deliberate the
bad
choices, and he/she could become a reformed person.
To conclude
, the debate over death
penalty
versus
life
sentence
will remain one of the controversial topics. There are pros and cons to both sides of the story, and the decision to
go with
one of these
punishments
will depend on the belief system of a country.