Some would argue that History should be the primary subject that students learn in schools, but others consider that the subjects like Science and Technology are more vital than History in education. In this article both views will be discussed and will be tried to come up with a reasonable conclusion.
There are many people who think that History should be included in academic curriculums in a more dominant way than other subjects. Learning History can be beneficial for children because it may make students to be better prepared for future. The past of each nation is full of important incidents and students who are able to take lessons from those will be able to create new and more effective solutions for the future’s issues. For instance, several wrong political decisions made by ex-politicians could be found in history books to understand the shortcomings of those decisions. therefore, those people make sure that they are never repeated in the future. Overall, focused education on History can widen student’s horizons and improve their intellectual thinking for upcoming problems.
On the other hand, it is a common idea that Science and Technology are the most important subjects rather than History. As the population grows, natural resources will not be enough for the society in the near future and the only way to sustain high life standarts for people goes through creating new resources while using Technology and Science. Therefore, having advanced knowledge in these subjects is the key factor for the survival of human kind and hope for future generations. For example, scientist are trying to find new oxygen resources with the help of the technology nowadays.
To conclude, learning about Technology and Science are more crucial than learning about History due to the fact that they are more vital for human’s existence.
Some
would argue that
History
should be the primary
subject
that
students
learn in schools,
but
others consider that the
subjects
like
Science
and
Technology
are more vital than
History
in education. In this article both views will
be discussed
and will
be tried
to
come
up with a reasonable conclusion.
There are
many
people
who
think
that
History
should
be included
in academic curriculums in a more dominant way than other
subjects
. Learning
History
can be beneficial for children
because
it may
make
students
to be better prepared for
future
. The past of each nation is full of
important
incidents and
students
who are able to take lessons from those will be able to create new and more effective solutions for the
future’s
issues.
For instance
, several
wrong
political decisions made by ex-politicians could
be found
in
history
books to understand the shortcomings of those decisions.
therefore
, those
people
make
sure that they are never repeated in the
future
.
Overall
, focused education on
History
can widen
student’s
horizons and
improve
their intellectual thinking for upcoming problems.
On the other hand
, it is a common
idea
that
Science
and
Technology
are the most
important
subjects
rather
than
History
. As the population grows, natural resources will not be
enough
for the society in the near
future
and the
only
way to sustain high life
standarts
for
people
goes
through creating new resources while using
Technology
and
Science
.
Therefore
, having advanced knowledge in these
subjects
is the key factor for the survival of
human kind
and hope for
future
generations.
For example
, scientist are trying to find new oxygen resources with the
help
of the
technology
nowadays.
To conclude
, learning about
Technology
and
Science
are more crucial than learning about
History
due to the fact that they are more vital for human’s existence.