Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people prefer to live in a house, while others feel that there are more advantages to living in an apartment Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment?

Some people prefer to live in a house, while others feel that there are more advantages to living in an apartment Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment? 8qrx

Although living in a house is thought by some to be superior to living in an apartment, other people consider the latter to be the preferable option. In my opinion, I think that living in an apartment has more merits to it than living in a house. Admittedly, there are some basic benefits of living in a house. Firstly, it is usually quieter than an apartment. In other words, houses are normally more separated from other architectural developments and, therefore, their inhabitants do not need to suffer noises produced by others. To illustrate, people who live in a block of flats may have problems with sleep due to the annoying sounds made by their neighbours at night. Secondly, houses in general are more spacious, which allows having more rooms and household facilities. As a result, families who occupy them can, for example, enjoy an indoor swimming pool or gym. Nevertheless, despite the advantages above, I believe there are serious drawbacks of owning or renting a house. One serious problem is the fact that houses are generally more expensive to buy and maintaining them is more arduous than apartments. The associated expenses are much higher, as not only are the average prices of these properties very high, but also the utility bills tend to be detrimental for the family budget. For instance, it is hardly attainable to find a house in London that would cost less than one million pounds. Furthermore, normally more houses are located in the suburban area instead of the city centre. As a result, it might be difficult for the people who are not drivers to access various places which tend to be in more central locations, such as high-end shops, banks or universities. In conclusion, being less cost-effective and having issues with travelling to the city centre far outweighs any of the minor benefits that could result from living in a house.

Although You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbreathingcontemporary
living
 in a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
house
 is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonedassumedbelievedconsidered
thought
 by This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 to be superior to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbreathingcontemporary
living
 in an You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflatresidencecavesuiteaccommodationpenthouse
apartment
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 consider the latter to be the preferable option. In my opinion, I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbreathingcontemporary
living
 in an You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflatresidencecavesuiteaccommodationpenthouse
apartment
 has more merits to it than You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbreathingcontemporary
living
 in a This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :residence
house
.

Admittedly
, there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 basic benefits of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbreathingcontemporary
living
 in a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
house
. Firstly
, it is usually
 quieter than an You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflatresidencecavesuiteaccommodationpenthouse
apartment
. In You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 words, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
houses
 are normally
 more separated from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 architectural developments and, therefore
, their inhabitants do not need to suffer noises produced by others. To illustrate, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 who This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
 in a block of flats may have problems with sleep due to the annoying sounds made by their Possible spelling mistake. 'neighbours' is British English.neighbors
neighbours
 at night. Secondly
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
houses
in general
 are more spacious, which This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :authorizes
allows
 having more rooms and household facilities. As a result
, families who occupy them can, for example
, enjoy an indoor swimming pool or gym.

Nevertheless
, despite the advantages above, I believe there are serious drawbacks of owning or renting a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
house
. One serious problem is the fact that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
houses
 are generally
 more expensive to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :purchase
buy
 and maintaining them is more arduous than You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflatresidencecavesuiteaccommodationpenthouse
apartments
. The associated expenses are much higher, as not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 are the average prices of these properties This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 high, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
 the utility bills tend to be detrimental for the family budget. For instance
, it is hardly attainable to find a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
house
 in London that would cost less than one million pounds. Furthermore
, normally
 more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
houses
are located
 in the suburban area instead
 of the city Possible spelling mistake. 'centre' is British English.center
centre
. As a result
, it might be difficult for the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 who are not drivers to access various places which tend to be in more central locations, such as high-This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
 shops, banks or universities.

In conclusion
, being less cost-effective and having issues with travelling to the city Possible spelling mistake. 'centre' is British English.center
centre
 far outweighs any of the minor benefits that could result from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbreathingcontemporary
living
 in a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbuildingboxapartmentdwellingresidenceshack
house
. 