Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people feel that zoos are cruel and should be closed down. Others, however, believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals.

Some people feel that zoos are cruel and should be closed down. Others, however, believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. k3nN

Zoo is an issue which generates great deal of heated debates, with supporters maintaining that it protects animals, whilst opponents claim that it is cruel. One very convincing argument in favour of zoo is that by living in zoo, animals are not compelled to kill other animals in order to receive food. For instance, animals from zoos eat food which was given by individuals, while in freedom, there are abound of mortal combats for survival. Consequently, zoo is the best way to prevent fights between wild animals. The other's is that zoos prevent not only cruel fights, but also extinction, as the more animals live in zoos, the less victims will be. Thereby, putting animals in zoos saves lives of animals. In contrast, opponents of zoo point out that it is cruel, irrespective of benefits. Firstly, animals in zoos are subject to isolation, as they don't live there with their own will. In other words, they are put there at the expence of freedom. Secondly, some animals are not able to live in cages due to their lifestyle. Finally, it is fair to say that zoos disrupt animal's live. All things considered, it can be concluded that a certain degree of living animals in zoos is always necessary. The best course of action would be to attempt to achieve a balance between supporters on the one hand, and opponents on the other.

Zoo is an issue which generates great deal of heated debates, with supporters maintaining that it protects You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
, whilst opponents claim that it is cruel.

One This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 convincing argument in Possible spelling mistake. 'favour' is British English.favor
favour
 of zoo is that by living in zoo, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are not compelled to kill other You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 in order to receive food. For instance
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 from zoos eat food which was This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 by individuals, while in freedom, there are Consider using a past participle here: "abounded".abounded
abound
 of mortal combats for survival. Consequently
, zoo is the best way to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :preclude
prevent
 fights between wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
. The other's is that zoos This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :preclude
prevent
 not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 cruel fights, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
 extinction, as the more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withalive
live
 in zoos, the Did you mean "fewer"? The noun victims is countable.fewer
less
 victims will be. Thereby, putting You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 in zoos saves You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
lives
 of animals.

In contrast
, opponents of zoo point out that it is cruel, irrespective of benefits. Firstly
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 in zoos are subject to isolation, as they don't You use this word too often, consider replacing it withalive
live
 there with their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
 will. In other words
, they are put
 there at the Possible spelling mistake found.expenseex pence
expence
 of freedom. Secondly
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are not able to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withalive
live
 in cages due to their lifestyle. Finally
, it is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :equitable
fair
 to say that zoos disrupt animal's This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
.

All things considered, it can be concluded
 that a certain degree of living You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 in zoos is always necessary. The best course of action would be to attempt to achieve a balance between supporters on the one hand, and opponents on the other. 