Humanity began actively to study space since 19th century and continues to this day while spending a lot of money. While some are optimistic about expensive expeditions into space, there are those who oppose. Both of sides have convincing arguments in their favor. In this essay we will try to understand each of the sides.
The governments of many countries allocate a lot of money for space expedition. Some people think such costs are reasonable and necessary. The growing problems with overpopulation, such as the lack of food, water and land, the threat of nuclear disasters and possible collisions of the Earth with space objects, can only be solved by studying space. For example, in the past, the American space company NASA prevented a catastrophe. A huge meteorite fell to the ground and NASA, thanks to space rockets, changed the trajectory of the space object. Thus, it was possible to avoid tragedy and save the lives of earthlings.
As you know finance resources limited, but problems on the Earth never limited. It is believed that it is better to spent money for solving problems on the Earth, instead of expensive space expedition. Such common issues as global warning, air pollution, lack of clean water possible to solve with significant cash investments.
As we can see both sides are right in their own way. So I think that governments need to find balance between expensive space expeditions and solve “Earth problems”.
Humanity began
actively
to study
space
since 19th century and continues to this day while spending
a lot of
money. While
some
are optimistic about expensive
expeditions
into
space
, there are those who oppose. Both of sides have convincing arguments in their favor. In this essay we will try to understand each of the sides.
The
governments
of
many
countries allocate
a lot of
money for
space
expedition
.
Some
people
think
such costs are reasonable and necessary. The growing
problems
with overpopulation, such as the lack of food, water and land, the threat of nuclear disasters and possible collisions of the
Earth
with
space
objects, can
only
be solved
by studying
space
.
For example
, in the past, the American
space
company
NASA
prevented
a catastrophe. A huge meteorite fell to the ground and NASA, thanks to
space
rockets,
changed
the trajectory of the
space
object.
Thus
, it was possible to avoid tragedy and save the
lives
of earthlings.
As you know finance resources limited,
but
problems
on the
Earth
never limited. It
is believed
that it is better to spent money for solving
problems
on the
Earth
,
instead
of expensive
space
expedition
. Such common issues as global warning, air pollution, lack of clean water possible to solve with significant cash investments.
As
we can
see
both sides are right in their
own
way.
So
I
think
that
governments
need to find balance between expensive
space
expeditions
and solve
“Earth
problems”
.