some people encourage mass immigration and some of them refused Should mass immigration be encouraged?

Throughout human history people have moved from place to place. Some people travel for economic reasons such as the search for work, while others migrate to join their family members or seek academic achievement. Others, James (2019) noted move to escape conflict, mistreatment and terrorism or human rights violations and as some migrate due to the effects of climate change or other natural disasters and environmental factors. In recent years, immigration has increased to developed countries; this movement has left remarkable and significant impacts. To illustrate this, since World War II, immigrants have formed a large regional population that is comparable with any previous time. Bureau (2016) found that the number of externally born individuals is approximately the same as it was at the end of the 19th and 20th centuries, when about 15% of the U. S. population was born overseas. Consequently, it is becoming a fierce debate platform in several major countries and a number of studies have been conducted. Therefore, two essential stances have been taken by opponents and supporters of this controversial issue. Although the opponents presented the negative effects of mass immigration, this essay will offer the positive effects of mass immigration and the fact that immigrants should be encouraged and welcomed across the world. This essay will discuss and rebut some arguments on the negative impact of mass immigration on the economic, cultural and social aspects of the destination countries. One of the main negative aspects of immigration could be unemployment. Marchiori et al. , (2018) suggested that a high number of researchers mention destination countries could suffer from crowding populations. This issue places a burden on countries, such as a shortage in career opportunities, pressure on countries' public services, and competition of advantageous works, according to Pais (2013). In addition, Pais stated that the highest productive jobs will be worked by low-skilled immigrants with low wages rather than having those jobs occupied by the expert local population, for example, some architecture and agricultural engineering. She went on to say that this immoral functional exploitation will completely destroy creativity and innovation. It was concluded that widespread poverty and need for welfare in host countries was due to the rising rate of unemployment. In contrast, recent studies have indicated that migrants are actually positive contributors to the economy. Pais referred to the persuaded fact that foreign-born workers in the U. S. economy are set at all levels of the professional hierarchy, including desirable and profitable careers. Moreover, this issue could increase prospects of economic growth in the country of origin by a salient channel of monetary remittances that rescue those countries from poverty and might even inspire the creation of small businesses such as carpentry, blacksmithing and agriculture. The small businesses could gradually develop and contribute to the booming economy of developing countries according to Marchiori et al. , (2018). In addition, successful experiences will be transferred and benefit those enterprises in developing countries when manpower returned from overseas to work. These are not the only benefits of mass immigration as there are enormous advantages for those who have been participating in raising the economy in developed countries. These advantages, Marchiori et al went on to state could be that taxes are raised from migrants and that they could be working in low level professions which are not desireable to the local population. As mentioned above mass immigration effectively supports economic growth in both developed and developing countries. The second counterargument argues for the loss of culture. Several surveys were conducted to investigate citizens’ acceptance of the idea of mass immigration. Alesina et al. , (2018) noted that the results of those studies involved repudiation based on habits and cultural differences. Researchers claim that mass immigration may cause a loss of migrants’ national identity, feeling of belonging to and forgetting their native country’s history. Foner et al. (2018) suggested that this history is important for citizens to be proud of their united national identity and to defend it. In addition, the opponents claim that mass immigration causes losses in their mother language, which is a big part of cultural identity. There are a high percentage of immigrants who forget their mother language, and this is especially the case for the younger generations who were born outside of their home country. Persecution and racism are some examples of prejudice towards immigrants. . They refer to the persecution that occurs when preventing immigrants from enjoying their human rights. With the example of racism, there can be a lack of acceptance of any non-native residents, and this has a number of different cultural, religious, ethnic and nationality issues that accompany this. Nevertheless, it can be argued that mass immigration has achieved many great accomplishments. The main achievements are an exchange of understanding of cultural civilizations, traditional arts, values and lifestyles which were taught in public institutions as fundamental material. The major benefit behind this is the acquaintance with newcomers' societal culture and the encouragement of citizens to respect and appreciate immigrant civilizations. Moreover, obtaining an efficient education and mastering of foreign languages is one of the intended objectives of mass immigration according to Jiang et al. , (2019). In addition, Jiang went on to say that the addressing of racism and the enforcing of justice immigration administration was established in destination countries in order to care for immigrants' rights as native residents. In summary, mass immigration has played an essential role in recognizing various humanities arts and the acquisition of important languages. . Nonetheless, opponents have argued that a harmful result of this issue might be the rupturing of familial relationships for immigrants. Chernoff et al (2019) explained the impaired familial relationships lead to psychological problems such as anxiety, depression, stomach complaints and diseases. Moreover, Suárez-Orozco, (2009) concluded that the psychological disorders could be harming migrant parents and their children. The emotional stress and confusion might influence security, stability, leading to violence and teenage crimes while immigrant parents' supervision is absent. However, technological development is considered a great solution to help immigrant families communicate. This will undoubtedly invalidate opponents’ arguments regarding mass immigration and its damage on household relationships and health. Recent studies confirm that permanent communication by technological methods may participate in alleviating migrants' homeland nostalgia. When obtaining a psychological balance, it will encourage migrants to stay at work, which in turn increases the family income and improves the standard of living according to Chernoff et al. , (2019). To sum up, despite opponents presenting a negative psychological effect related to the social life of newcomers, supporters have solved this problem via technological communication. In conclusion, the issue of mass immigration has become a serious issue for public debate. Although scholars point out the negative and positive impacts of mass immigration, the results of recent studies strongly favours mass immigration because of economic and cultural benefits are unlimited in both the home and destination countries. It is therefore worth stating that the arguments presented in favour of immigration far outweigh those stated against it.