Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Article 9 of the Prague Rules which is designated to stimulate hybrid procedure, in particular arbitration-mediation, does not define any restriction on any technique which may have adverse effect on the final award

Article 9 of the Prague Rules which is designated to stimulate hybrid procedure, in particular arbitration-mediation, does not define any restriction on any technique which may have adverse effect on the final award MMrNL
Article 9 of the Prague Rules which is designated to stimulate hybrid procedure, in particular arbitration-mediation, does not define any restriction on any technique which may have adverse effect on the final award. The most problematic technique is “caucusing” which is the main tool for the success of whole mediation process. During caucusing the parties could in ex parte meetings divulge secrets that they would not have disclosed during the normal course of the arbitration to the arbitrator-turned-mediator and to the other parties. Use of caucusing technique, which is not prohibited under the Prague Rules, may result with the challenge of final award on the grounds of: i) the partiality of mediating arbitrator and ii) the breach of the due process. Moreover, under Article 9 of the Prague Rules, there is a lack of some “safeguards” (for ensuring the enforceability of final award) which can also has significant potential for risking the enforceability of final award.
Article 9 of the Prague
Rules
which
is designated
to stimulate hybrid procedure,
in particular
arbitration-mediation, does not define any restriction on any technique which may have adverse effect on the
final
award.

The most problematic technique is “caucusing” which is the main tool for the success of whole mediation process. During caucusing the parties could in ex parte meetings divulge secrets that they would not have disclosed during the normal course of the arbitration to the arbitrator-turned-mediator and to the other parties.
Use
of caucusing technique, which is not prohibited under the Prague
Rules
, may result with the challenge of
final
award on the grounds of: i) the partiality of mediating arbitrator and ii) the breach of the due process.

Moreover
, under Article 9 of the Prague
Rules
, there is a lack of
some
“safeguards” (for ensuring the
enforceability
of
final
award) which can
also
has significant potential for risking the
enforceability
of
final
award.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Article 9 of the Prague Rules which is designated to stimulate hybrid procedure, in particular arbitration-mediation, does not define any restriction on any technique which may have adverse effect on the final award

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
156 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: