As health crisis in western nations continues unabated, critics demand healthier diet modification. From my perspective, I disagree with the aforementioned cognitive bias because not everyone would be capable of accommodating dietary changes.
It is true that western communities are faced with the propelling risks of suffering from chronic internal health hazards resulting from the ubiquity of junk foods. In other words, ready-made products from American fast-food giants such as McDonald’s or BurgerKing might contain certain amounts of chemicals, which not only leads to severe addiction to sweeteners but also diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or raised blood cholesterol levels. Besides, it has been reported even daily consumption of wholegrain cereals, which are considered healthy, triggers obesity despite frequent workout. Therefore, it is time the local government operated nutrition consultancy services as the last resort to improve their citizens' well-being.
Nevertheless, such aggravatingly detrimental diet is not a single problem from a population standpoint; rather there is seeming infinitude of variables influencing the intake and body reactions. Even the same diet could assert completely different effects on identical twins. For instance, plant-based and low-carbohydrate regimens appear to work miracles for some but not for others, indicating the nourishment should be determined depending on each individual. Furthermore, had metabolic and behavioral changes not taken weeks to fully develop, the likelihood of someone failing to adhere to the dietary guidelines would have diminished. On that account, I insist that western countries should preserve their current eating habits.
In conclusion, due to potential difficulties involved individual body’s responses and adapting time, it is recommended every western person be responsible for orienting their selection of foods in a manner to best satisfy their unique nutrition requirements.
As health crisis in western nations continues unabated, critics demand healthier diet modification. From my perspective, I disagree with the aforementioned cognitive bias
because
not everyone would be capable of accommodating dietary
changes
.
It is true that western communities
are faced
with the propelling
risks
of suffering from chronic internal health hazards resulting from the ubiquity of junk foods.
In other words
, ready-made products from American
fast
-food giants such as McDonald’s or
BurgerKing
might contain certain amounts of chemicals, which not
only
leads to severe addiction to sweeteners
but
also
diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or raised blood cholesterol levels.
Besides
, it has
been reported
even daily consumption of wholegrain cereals, which
are considered
healthy, triggers obesity despite frequent workout.
Therefore
, it is time the local
government
operated nutrition consultancy services as the last resort to
improve
their citizens' well-being.
Nevertheless
, such
aggravatingly
detrimental diet is not a single problem from a population standpoint;
rather
there
is seeming
infinitude of variables influencing the intake and body reactions. Even the same diet could assert completely
different
effects on identical twins.
For instance
, plant-based and low-carbohydrate regimens appear to work miracles for
some
but
not for others, indicating the nourishment should
be determined
depending on each individual.
Furthermore
, had metabolic and behavioral
changes
not taken weeks to
fully
develop, the likelihood of someone failing to adhere to the dietary guidelines would have diminished. On that account, I insist that western countries should preserve their
current
eating habits.
In conclusion
, due to potential difficulties involved individual body’s responses and adapting time, it
is recommended
every western person be responsible for orienting their selection of foods in a manner to best satisfy their unique nutrition requirements.