Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it legal requirement. rO2m
Some individuals believe that not enough of households’ waste is being recycled. They also believe that the only method in order to enhance recycling is for states to make it mandatory. I believe that laws are needed in this case because the environment needs to be protected and laws put fears in people’s mind. Laws have the power to encourage and force people to recycle their household waste in order to protect the environment. That is to say that waste contribute in a significant way in air pollution, therefore, by recycling, people will have a healthier atmosphere with clean air. Moreover, waste might play a vital role in spreading various diseases which affect citizens’ lives, thus if laws force people to recycle, all of these issues would be mitigated. For example, in Canada, the government implemented the recycling programme for their residents, which resulted in a healthier environment and a lower chance of catching different diseases. Another reason why laws are needed is that by making people pay fines, they will put fears in their mind. When governments introduce heavy fines for people who do not practice recycling, individuals will be afraid to not follow the rules and consequently they will recycle. For instance, in 2016, the Russian government introduced fines for people who do not recycle, which resulted in an increase of 80% in recycling. In conclusion, governments should make recycling a mandatory requirement and implement fines for people who do not recycle and also in order to protect the environment and obtain a healthier atmosphere.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
individuals believe that not
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
of households’
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
is
being recycled
. They
also
believe that the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
method in order to enhance
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
is for states to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
it mandatory. I believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
laws
are needed
in this case
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
needs to
be protected
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
laws
put fears in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people’s
mind.

Laws have the power to encourage and force
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycle
their household
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
in order to protect the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
.
That is
to say that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
contribute
Consider replacing "in a significant way" with the adverb for "significant"; e.g., "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
in a significant way
in air pollution,
therefore
, by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will have a healthier atmosphere with clean air.
Moreover
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
might play a vital role in spreading various diseases which affect citizens’
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
,
thus
if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
laws
force
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycle
, all of these issues would
be mitigated
.
For example
, in Canada, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
implemented the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
Possible spelling mistake. 'programme' is British English.
programme
for their residents, which resulted in a healthier
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
and a lower chance of catching
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
diseases.

Another reason why
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
laws
are needed
is that by making
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
pay
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fines
, they will put fears in their mind. When
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments
introduce heavy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fines
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who do not practice
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
, individuals will be afraid to not follow the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
and
consequently
they will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycle
.
For instance
, in 2016, the Russian
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
introduced
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fines
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who do not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycle
, which resulted in an increase of 80% in recycling.

In conclusion
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments
should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
a mandatory requirement and implement
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fines
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who do not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycle
and
also
in order to protect the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
and obtain a healthier atmosphere.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it legal requirement.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
257 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?