Whether all of things taught by teachers at school is valuable or not is a controversial issue. In my opinion, most of knowledge which students acquire in their academic career is beneficial to them.
The argument that many knowledge taught by teachers are useless is plausible. There is no denying that some courses have little practical value. For example, elementary politics and history are two compulsory courses during learning at school, but some students think these knowledge are so boring that they do not focus on them. Furthermore, these students are less likely to know how to apply them. Another evidence to support the argument is that students must learn some basic lessons such as math, foreign language and computer technology. Although these things are important for students' career in the future, students do not need to learn them deeply and systematically. In other words, it is enough for children to attain nearly intermediate level in terms of general knowledge. To be specific, there is no need that most of students learn calcus, liner algebra in the university.
However, some people think that all kinds of things learning at school are valuable. This statement is right to some extent. Firstly, the school is a place where people get necessary knowledge qualified for their jobs. If a person want to be a entrepreneur, he need to take a MBA program or something relevant to management and corporate finance. Secondly, students can be moral and distinguish right from wrong through some relevant compulsory courses. It is obvious that this statement exaggerate the fact. Not anything learned at school can students benefit from.
In conclusion, people can learn ethics and necessary skills for work when they are students. However, some courses are lack of practice and less necessary.
Whether
all of things
taught by teachers at
school
is valuable or not is a controversial issue. In my opinion, most of
knowledge
which
students
acquire in their academic career is beneficial to them.
The argument that
many
knowledge
taught by teachers are useless is plausible. There is no denying that
some
courses
have
little
practical value.
For example
, elementary politics and history are two compulsory
courses
during learning at
school
,
but
some
students
think
these
knowledge
are
so
boring that they do not focus on them.
Furthermore
, these
students
are less likely to know how to apply them. Another evidence to support the argument is that
students
must
learn
some
basic lessons such as math, foreign language and computer technology. Although these things are
important
for students' career in the future,
students
do not need to
learn
them
deeply
and
systematically
.
In other words
, it is
enough
for children to attain
nearly
intermediate level in terms of general
knowledge
. To be specific, there is no need that most of
students
learn
calcus
, liner algebra in the university.
However
,
some
people
think
that all kinds of things learning at
school
are valuable. This statement is right to
some
extent.
Firstly
, the
school
is a place where
people
get
necessary
knowledge
qualified for their jobs. If a person want to be
a
entrepreneur, he need to take
a
MBA program or something relevant to management and corporate finance.
Secondly
,
students
can be moral and distinguish right from
wrong
through
some
relevant compulsory
courses
. It is obvious that this statement exaggerate the fact. Not anything learned at
school
can
students
benefit from.
In conclusion
,
people
can
learn
ethics and necessary
skills
for work when they are
students
.
However
,
some
courses
are lack of practice and less necessary.