Gender equality has been a heated debate in past few decades when advocates claim for woman’s rights in choosing a career in the police or the armed forces. There are value arguments on both sides which I will discuss now.
On the one hand, there is no reason why females are not selected for a position in politics or the military. Firstly, in the modern world, women have the right to pursue any career which they are interested in, no matter they like being a politician or a soldier. With the multi-tasking mindset, the fair sex has proven they are the best at any jobs assigned to them. Theresa May, for example, the commendable Prime Minister of England, also named as the Steel Woman, shows to the world that she has been doing the great job to lead a European prosperous country. Secondly, the desk jobs in the states are more suitable for women than men because women are more patient and meticulous. These character traits are undeniable and ones of women’s potentials.
However, some believe having a job in the political and military field is not for females for some certain extents. It is a common sense to admit that these jobs require endurance and physical strengths, which fit the man’s condition. Long hours of training or being sent abroad to a real battle is a part of the job’s requirements, and males are likely to be more suitable. Moreover, people argue that women tend to be more emotional and less decisive than men, therefore, the results could be misled. A wrong decision, especially in politics, is real threat not only for the country itself but also for the citizen’s life. As the result, it affects the selection for a job in a police department or military force.
In conclusion, although women are free to choose a job they want, I am in favor of the idea that desk jobs are more suitable for women if they like to work for government in politics or military force.
Gender equality has been a heated debate in past few decades when advocates claim for woman’s rights in choosing a career in the police or the armed forces. There are value arguments on both sides which I will discuss
now
.
On the one hand, there is no reason why females are not selected for a position in politics or the military.
Firstly
, in the modern world,
women
have the right to pursue any career which they
are interested
in, no matter they like being a politician or a soldier. With the multi-tasking mindset, the
fair sex
has proven they are the best at any
jobs
assigned to them. Theresa May,
for example
, the commendable Prime Minister of England,
also
named as the Steel Woman,
shows
to the world that she has been doing the great
job
to lead a European prosperous country.
Secondly
, the desk
jobs
in the states are more suitable for
women
than
men
because
women
are more patient and meticulous. These character traits are undeniable and ones of
women’s
potentials.
However
,
some
believe having a
job
in the political and military field is not for females for
some
certain extents. It is a common sense to admit that these
jobs
require endurance and physical strengths, which fit the
man
’s condition. Long hours of training or being
sent
abroad to a real battle is a part of the
job’s
requirements, and males are likely to be more suitable.
Moreover
,
people
argue that
women
tend to be more emotional and less decisive than
men
,
therefore
, the results could
be misled
. A
wrong
decision,
especially
in politics, is real threat not
only
for the country itself
but
also
for the citizen’s life. As the result, it affects the selection for a
job
in a police department or military force.
In conclusion
, although
women
are free to choose a
job
they want, I am in favor of the
idea
that desk
jobs
are more suitable for
women
if they like to work for
government
in politics or military force.