Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that visual images (such as photos and videos) provide enough evidence that a crime was committed. Others think that they are not enough on their own and other evidence is needed. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people believe that visual images (such as photos and videos) provide enough evidence that a crime was committed. Others think that they are not enough on their own and other evidence is needed. qVex5
People have different opinions on whether pictures and videos from crimes provide enough proof or other pieces of evidence are required. Although the visual clues facilitate the process of criminal recognition, I think more evidence is needed for making final decisions. On the one hand, some commentators believe that the visual images provide the crime investigators with undeniable evidence to condemn the criminals. Thanks to CCTV's availability all around the cities, the police force can easily track down crimes and survey the streets to make sure that a crime was committed. Unlike those used to be manipulated in the past, the new version of cameras provides quality pictures and videos with transparent pixels to zoom in and out, so they can patrol the crimes and distinguish the criminal's faces proof to prosecute them. Camera and pictures, therefore, are enough for the judge to put the criminals behind bars. On the other hand, some people believe that a lot can be inferred from the way pictures and videos depict the crime. They argue that, like what we see in crime movies, the professional delinquents can design the site to mislead and confuse the investigators by adding some artificial actions on the area that the camera captures or hack the cameras. Therefore, these people believe that other substantial evidence should not be neglected, like prior intentions and time factors. For example, I watched a movie that the low breakers who intended to rub a bank hacked the leading CCTV and disrupted its function for a couple of hours. When they vacated the bank, the CCTV started recording again while there was a time gap that the staff was not aware of. When they found out that the bank had been rubbed, they started checking the videos and accusing the passengers who looked suspicious and had a long criminal record. Finally, this man was incarcerated for several years in prison. The big mistake that they forgot to check was that there was no correlation between the time the condemned man entered the bank and the time the bank had been rubbed. In conclusion, although technology has facilitated many areas in our lives, and finding crimes is also no exception, I believe that other evidence is required to ensure that neither the pictures and videos tampered with nor the cameras are hacked.
People
have
different
opinions on whether
pictures
and
videos
from
crimes
provide
enough
proof or
other
pieces of
evidence
are required
. Although the visual clues facilitate the process of
criminal
recognition, I
think
more
evidence
is needed
for making final decisions.

On the one hand,
some
commentators
believe
that the visual images provide the
crime
investigators with undeniable
evidence
to condemn the
criminals
. Thanks to CCTV's availability all around the cities, the police force can
easily
track
down
crimes
and survey the streets to
make
sure that a
crime
was committed
. Unlike those
used
to
be manipulated
in the past, the new version of
cameras
provides quality
pictures
and
videos
with transparent pixels to zoom in and out,
so
they can patrol the
crimes
and distinguish the criminal's faces proof to prosecute them.
Camera
and
pictures
,
therefore
, are
enough
for the judge to put the
criminals
behind bars.

On the
other
hand,
some
people
believe
that a lot can
be inferred
from the way
pictures
and
videos
depict the
crime
. They argue that, like what we
see
in
crime
movies, the professional delinquents can design the site to mislead and confuse the investigators by adding
some
artificial actions on the area that the
camera
captures or hack the
cameras
.
Therefore
, these
people
believe
that
other
substantial
evidence
should not
be neglected
, like prior intentions and
time
factors.
For example
, I
watched
a movie that the low breakers who intended to rub a
bank
hacked the leading CCTV and disrupted its function for a couple of hours. When they vacated the
bank
, the CCTV
started
recording again while there was a
time
gap that the staff was not aware of. When they found out that the
bank
had
been rubbed
, they
started
checking the
videos
and accusing the passengers who looked suspicious and had a long
criminal
record.
Finally
, this
man
was incarcerated
for several years in prison. The
big
mistake that they forgot to
check
was that there was no correlation between the
time
the condemned
man
entered the
bank
and the
time
the
bank
had
been rubbed
.

In conclusion
, although technology has facilitated
many
areas in our
lives
, and finding
crimes
is
also
no exception, I
believe
that
other
evidence
is required
to ensure that neither the
pictures
and
videos
tampered with nor the
cameras
are hacked
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people believe that visual images (such as photos and videos) provide enough evidence that a crime was committed. Others think that they are not enough on their own and other evidence is needed.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
388 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts