Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime, Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
People have different views about the real punishment for every type of crime. while other opine that in fact of personal crime and for the motivation to commit it, should be count when decide the fix punishments, I wholeheartedly believe that to the first opinion.
According to some people, they believe if every each variant of crime must have a fixed punishment. Because crime is not just about something that disturbs someone comfort but is that also something can be dangerous for life or else. For example from the easiest crime like stealing and the hardest crime like robbery. Approximately, about 85 percent from the population in the world definitely doing something bad.
On the other hand, people argue that the fact and motivation for commit the crime must be count when decide the punishments, Back into the point, for example when someone want to run a crime, they definitely have a motivation to do it, such as because hated of someone or because just want to another people feel the same pain. Because 70 percent when the court judging about someone’s crime they did not count about the motivation. so that matters such as crimes of a serious nature can be handled properly if the motive of the perpetrator is taken into account in deciding the sentence.
Finally, in my opinion. Whether needing a fixed punishment for every crime or count the motive when decide the punishment, depends on the court or police to eradicate the crime. And public also have a big role to keep an eye on every single person’s behavior. So that, motive for doing some bad stuff can be decreasing in public even on the country.
In summary, for decrease the crime, many people will need the rules who can punish everything from motive until evidence of crime, in that way the evil out there can be handled properly.
People
have
different
views about the real
punishment
for every type of
crime
.
while
other opine that in fact of personal
crime
and for the
motivation
to commit it, should be
count
when decide the
fix
punishments
, I
wholeheartedly
believe that to the
first
opinion.
According to
some
people
, they believe if every each variant of
crime
must
have a
fixed
punishment
.
Because
crime
is not
just
about something that disturbs
someone
comfort
but
is that
also
something can be
dangerous
for life or else.
For example
from the easiest
crime
like stealing and the hardest
crime
like robbery. Approximately, about 85 percent from the population in the world definitely doing something
bad
.
On the other hand
,
people
argue that the fact and
motivation
for commit the
crime
must
be
count
when decide the
punishments
, Back into the point,
for example
when
someone
want
to run a
crime
, they definitely have a
motivation
to do it, such as
because
hated of
someone
or
because
just
want to another
people
feel the same pain.
Because
70 percent when the court judging about
someone’s
crime
they did not
count
about the
motivation
.
so
that matters such as
crimes
of a serious nature can
be handled
properly
if the
motive
of the perpetrator
is taken
into account in deciding the sentence.
Finally
, in my opinion. Whether needing a
fixed
punishment
for every
crime
or
count
the
motive
when decide the
punishment
, depends on the court or police to eradicate the
crime
. And public
also
have a
big
role to
keep
an eye on every single person’s behavior.
So
that,
motive
for doing
some
bad
stuff can be decreasing in public even on the country.
In summary, for decrease the
crime
,
many
people
will need the
rules
who can punish everything from
motive
until evidence of
crime
, in that way the evil out there can
be handled
properly
.