In today's world, the health
of people
mainly depends on the food
they are consuming. People
of our era eat too much food
which makes their health
deteriorate. The argument
that education
is to help to inform about the hazards of food
is a topic which is supported and refuted by many. Both sides of this
argument
will be analyzed before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
Firstly, it is easy to see the importance of education
in our life. Most people, from the young to the old, are getting an education
from somewhere. If education
is used to combat fat food
so as to make people
more healthy, it will be easier and faster to get results, because it is easy to spread this
information through education. For example, one child who taught about the connection between fast food
and health
at school spreads information to their family or friends. Because of this, it is clear why argument
education
is the key to inform ones about the risks of fast food
has garnered support.
However, on the other side of the argument, it must be remembered that most make decisions depending on their feelings, not their knowledge. For example, when one wants to eat hamburgers or fries, he/she will buy them anyway, in spite of knowing clearly the bad sides of them. Thus, this
makes it clear why the argument
that education
may not be the best way to fight against fast food
could also
be plausible.
In summary both sides of this
argument
regarding whether education
should be used to convince people
not to eat too much junk food
or not have strong support. However, after analyzing bot positions, I think education
greatly helps humanity become aware of the health
problems caused by fast food.
In
today
's world, the health
of
people
mainly
depends on the food
they
are consuming.
People
of our era eat too much food
which
makes
their health
deteriorate
. The
argument
that education
is to
help
to inform about the hazards of food
is
a topic which
is supported
and refuted by
many
. Both
sides
of
this
argument
will
be analyzed
before
a reasoned conclusion
is drawn
.
Firstly
, it is easy to
see
the importance of education
in
our life. Most
people
, from the young to the
old
, are getting an
education
from
somewhere. If
education
is
used
to combat
fat
food
so as to
make
people
more healthy, it will be easier and faster to
get
results,
because
it is easy to spread this
information
through education.
For example
, one child who taught about the
connection between
fast
food
and health
at
school spreads information to their family or friends.
Because of this
, it is
clear
why
argument
education
is the key to inform ones about the
risks
of
fast
food
has
garnered support.
However
, on the other side of the argument, it
must
be remembered
that most
make
decisions depending on their feelings, not their knowledge.
For example
, when one wants to eat hamburgers or fries, he/she will
buy
them anyway,
in spite of
knowing
clearly
the
bad
sides
of them.
Thus
, this
makes
it
clear
why the argument
that education
may not be the best way to fight against
fast
food
could
also
be
plausible.
In summary both
sides
of this
argument
regarding whether education
should be
used
to convince
people
not to eat too much junk food
or
not have strong support.
However
, after analyzing bot positions, I
think
education
greatly
helps
humanity become aware of the health
problems
caused by
fast
food.