There has been much discussion revolving around making social service mandatory for High School students. Some educators and policy makers propose that this move will benefit not only the students but also the society, while others argue that compulsory service is no service at all. This essay weighs the merits of this move over its demerits and sides with proposal as beneficial for all.
Students learn many realities of life only with grass-root level interactions, and this molds their thinking and prepares future leaders and change-makers of the nation. When schools include community work as part of curriculum, youngsters get an exposure to civil life and learn to empathize with the needs of the less privileged sections of society, albeit some students may feel forced out of their comfort zones. Many surveys show that students who interact closely with the underprivileged sections of society later take up social issues passionately and aim for Civil Service Exams to be a voice for the voiceless. Our society can do with many more young leaders and politicians, community service will go a long way in propelling students in that direction.
This move has some detractors who feel mandatory social service will be a burden on students and lead to resentment. Furthermore, they point out to the diverse interests of students and giving them the freedom to pursue their own fields of interest would be ideal for them. It is possible that some students may do it grudgingly with no real interest or service mindedness. This argument may be valid to a certain extent, however on further analysis, a different experience would speak otherwise.
To summarize, the argument that making the youth involved in social work involuntarily may restrict the freedom of choice is valid to a certain extent; however, closer examination reveals that many life changing lessons are learnt in such initiatives which can transform society.
There has been much discussion revolving around making
social
service
mandatory for High School
students
.
Some
educators and
policy makers
propose that this
move
will benefit not
only
the
students
but
also
the
society
, while others argue that compulsory
service
is no
service
at all. This essay weighs the merits of this
move
over its demerits and sides with proposal as beneficial for all.
Students learn
many
realities of life
only
with grass-root level interactions, and this molds their thinking and prepares future leaders and
change
-makers of the nation. When schools include community work as part of curriculum, youngsters
get
an exposure to civil life and learn to empathize with the needs of the less privileged sections of
society
, albeit
some
students
may feel forced out of their comfort zones.
Many
surveys
show
that
students
who interact
closely
with the underprivileged sections of
society
later take up
social
issues
passionately
and aim for Civil
Service
Exams to be a voice for the voiceless. Our
society
can do with
many
more young leaders and politicians, community
service
will go a long way in propelling
students
in that direction.
This
move
has
some
detractors who feel mandatory
social
service
will be a burden on
students
and lead to resentment.
Furthermore
, they point out to the diverse interests of
students
and giving them the freedom to pursue their
own
fields of interest would be ideal for them. It is possible that
some
students
may do it
grudgingly
with no real interest or
service
mindedness. This argument may be valid to a certain extent,
however
on
further
analysis, a
different
experience would speak
otherwise
.
To summarize
, the argument that making the youth involved in
social
work
involuntarily
may restrict the freedom of choice is valid to a certain extent;
however
, closer examination reveals that
many
life changing
lessons are
learnt
in such initiatives which can transform
society
.