The issue of helping poor countries is universally acquiesced upon. However, when it comes to how it should be, controversy arises; a large number of people claim that providing financial support is not a fruitful one and there are other advantageous ways to assist them as I will discuss now.
Granting direct funding to poor countries to eliminate their difficulties is not a professional help and does not fundamentally handle those. As make them dependent nations, always need others’ financial assistance, which itself will transform into some trouble while being given the international corporation to seek the solutions for their challenging matters by themselves seems more beneficial. Take poverty in these nations as a notable example. Apparently, numerous inner factors have been contributing over several decades to form it and what they need is seeking its root to eradicate severe poverty. Consequently, finance is a superficial answer which creates a needy community instead of making them powerful to tackle their challenges.
Undoubtedly, poorer nations must be helped but via an effective method that made them society with a robust economy. For instance, rich countries with stable economic conditions are capable to strengthen the local marketing of the poor countries through buying their regional products. In fact, If commodities and goods produced in disadvantaged countries being acquired by developed countries, this would be a great help to their economic cycle. With the economic boom that will ensue, therefore, the financial hardships of these countries are going to improve in the long run which causes to alleviate some of the foremost problems such as poverty.
In conclusion, non-financial assistance from rich countries to the economies of poor countries will be more effective. 
The issue of helping  
poor
  countries
 is  
universally
 acquiesced upon.  
However
, when it  
comes
 to how it should be, controversy arises; a large number of  
people
 claim that providing financial support is not a fruitful one and there are other advantageous ways to assist them as I will discuss  
now
.
Granting direct funding to  
poor
  countries
 to eliminate their difficulties is not a professional  
help
 and does not  
fundamentally
 handle those. As  
make
 them dependent nations, always need others’ financial assistance, which itself will transform into  
some
 trouble while being  
given
 the international corporation to seek the solutions for their challenging matters by themselves seems more beneficial. Take poverty in these nations as a notable example.  
Apparently
, numerous inner factors have been contributing over several decades to form it and what they need is seeking its root to eradicate severe poverty.  
Consequently
, finance is a superficial answer which creates a needy community  
instead
 of making them powerful to tackle their challenges. 
Undoubtedly
, poorer nations  
must
 be  
helped
  but
 via an effective method that made them society with a robust economy.  
For instance
, rich  
countries
 with stable economic conditions are capable to strengthen the local marketing of the  
poor
  countries
 through buying their regional products. In fact, If commodities and  
goods
 produced in disadvantaged  
countries
  being acquired
 by developed  
countries
, this would be a great  
help
 to their economic cycle. With the economic boom that will ensue,  
therefore
, the financial hardships of these  
countries
 are going to  
improve
 in the long run which causes to alleviate  
some
 of the foremost problems such as poverty. 
In conclusion
, non-financial assistance from rich  
countries
 to the economies of  
poor
  countries
 will be more effective.