Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much; we should demolish them and build new ones intead. To what extend do you agree as disagree?

With an advent of mordernization, world is becoming a modern place every passing day. People no longer prefer to live in old fashioned homes. To keep yp with this trend and while reinnovating their buildings, individuals believes that it is too expensive and new one's should be built rather than restoeing an old one. I would like to shed a light on both the topics and would conclude with an opinion in the end. To embark upon, buildings that are too old are no longer in a position to provide adequate support. Renewing such constructions provides no assurance regarding the safety of the structure. Restoring is just a process from outside, one can't access on the inside. Even these maintaining tasks requires a large number of raw materials. From a pillar to paint, everything has to be considered and repairing certain aged things are even more cost effective than the new one's. All said and done, how can one ensure that the construct is absolutely safe? Just because it looks as good as new guarantees it's safety? Although demolishing and rebuilding woyld be an expensive option but in this way money will be spent only once whereas in maintaining, a new problem will surface every month and without even knowing a large sum of expense has already been incurred. However, on the contrary, not everyone has such big capital to just invest it in their house. Constructing a new building requires lots of money, time and efforts. From selecting a layout to choosing furniture, it is a rather tedious and long process. Also, people don't consider using old things in their brand new home and that again accounts for an increase in expenditure. Moreover, some buildings have beliefs and history associated with them. Consider an old church which is now destroyed and replaced by a new one. Though this is a postivie development, masses no longer supports this. They believe that the old church building existed since quite along time and it helped them reminisce the history of town which this new one fails to. Thus to conclude, I agree on the fact that constructs that are too aged should demolished and replaces by a new one rather than maintaining an old one. But for those who can't afford or those with history associated with a particular structure, restoration seems to be the only option feasible and available.
With an advent of
Possible spelling mistake found.
mordernization
, world is becoming a modern place every passing day.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
People
no longer prefer to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
in
This word is normally spelled with a hyphen.
old fashioned
homes. To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
Possible spelling mistake found.
yp
with this trend and while
Possible spelling mistake found.
reinnovating
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
, individuals believes that it is too expensive and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
one's should
be built
rather
than
Possible spelling mistake found.
restoeing
an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
one. I would like to shed a light on both the topics and would conclude with an opinion in the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
.

To embark upon,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
that are too
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
are no longer in a position to provide adequate support. Renewing such constructions provides no assurance regarding the safety of the structure. Restoring is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
a process from outside, one can't access on the inside. Even these maintaining tasks requires
Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use “many” or “numerous”
a large number of
raw materials. From a pillar to paint, everything
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
has to
be considered
and repairing certain aged things are even more
This word is normally spelled with a hyphen.
cost effective
than the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
one's. All said and done, how can one ensure that the construct is
absolutely
safe?
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Just
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it looks as
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
guarantees it's safety? Although demolishing and rebuilding
Possible spelling mistake found.
woyld
be an expensive option
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
in this way money will
be spent
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
once whereas in maintaining, a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
problem will surface every month and without even knowing a large sum of expense has already
been incurred
.

However
,
on the contrary
, not everyone has such
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
capital to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
invest it in their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
house
. Constructing a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
building
requires lots of money, time and efforts. From selecting a layout to choosing furniture, it is a
rather
tedious and long process.
Also
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
don't consider using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
things in their brand
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
home and that again accounts for an increase in expenditure.
Moreover
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
have beliefs and history associated with them. Consider an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
church which is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroyed
and replaced by a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
one. Though this is a
Possible spelling mistake found.
postivie
development, masses no longer supports this. They believe that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
church
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
building
existed since quite
Did you mean “a long time”?
along time
and it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helped
them reminisce the history of town which this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
one fails to.

Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Thus
to conclude
, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
on the fact that constructs that are too aged should
The modal verb ‘should’ requires the verb’s base form.
demolished
and replaces by a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
one
rather
than maintaining an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
one.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
for those who can't afford or those with history associated with a particular structure, restoration seems to be the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
option feasible and available.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much; we should demolish them and build new ones intead.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
398 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much; we should demolish them and build new ones intead. To what extend do you agree as disagree?