Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much; we should demolish them and build new ones intead. To what extend do you agree as disagree?

With an advent of mordernization, world is becoming a modern place every passing day. People no longer prefer to live in old fashioned homes. To keep yp with this trend and while reinnovating their buildings, individuals believes that it is too expensive and new one's should be built rather than restoeing an old one. I would like to shed a light on both the topics and would conclude with an opinion in the end. To embark upon, buildings that are too old are no longer in a position to provide adequate support. Renewing such constructions provides no assurance regarding the safety of the structure. Restoring is just a process from outside, one can't access on the inside. Even these maintaining tasks requires a large number of raw materials. From a pillar to paint, everything has to be considered and repairing certain aged things are even more cost effective than the new one's. All said and done, how can one ensure that the construct is absolutely safe? Just because it looks as good as new guarantees it's safety? Although demolishing and rebuilding woyld be an expensive option but in this way money will be spent only once whereas in maintaining, a new problem will surface every month and without even knowing a large sum of expense has already been incurred. However, on the contrary, not everyone has such big capital to just invest it in their house. Constructing a new building requires lots of money, time and efforts. From selecting a layout to choosing furniture, it is a rather tedious and long process. Also, people don't consider using old things in their brand new home and that again accounts for an increase in expenditure. Moreover, some buildings have beliefs and history associated with them. Consider an old church which is now destroyed and replaced by a new one. Though this is a postivie development, masses no longer supports this. They believe that the old church building existed since quite along time and it helped them reminisce the history of town which this new one fails to. Thus to conclude, I agree on the fact that constructs that are too aged should demolished and replaces by a new one rather than maintaining an old one. But for those who can't afford or those with history associated with a particular structure, restoration seems to be the only option feasible and available.

With an advent of Possible spelling mistake found.modernization
mordernization
, world is becoming a modern place every passing day. This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
People
 no longer prefer to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
 in This word is normally spelled with a hyphen.old-fashioned
old fashioned
 homes. To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :retain
keep
Possible spelling mistake found.YPupHPJPNPVP
yp
 with this trend and while Possible spelling mistake found.
reinnovating
 their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
, individuals believes that it is too expensive and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
 one's should be built
rather
 than Possible spelling mistake found.restoringres toeing
restoeing
 an You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgrayancienttiredelderlydecrepitvenerable
old
 one. I would like to shed a light on both the topics and would conclude with an opinion in the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
.

To embark upon, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
 that are too You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgrayancienttiredelderlydecrepitvenerable
old
 are no longer in a position to provide adequate support. Renewing such constructions provides no assurance regarding the safety of the structure. Restoring is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 a process from outside, one can't access on the inside. Even these maintaining tasks requires Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use “many” or “numerous”manynumerous
a large number of
 raw materials. From a pillar to paint, everything This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:oughts to
has to
be considered
 and repairing certain aged things are even more This word is normally spelled with a hyphen.cost-effective
cost effective
 than the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
 one's. All said and done, how can one ensure that the construct is absolutely
 safe? This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
Just
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 it looks as This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
 guarantees it's safety? Although demolishing and rebuilding Possible spelling mistake found.wouldworldwold
woyld
 be an expensive option This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 in this way money will be spent
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 once whereas in maintaining, a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
 problem will surface every month and without even knowing a large sum of expense has already been incurred
.

However
, on the contrary
, not everyone has such This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hugeenormousgiganticvast
big
 capital to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 invest it in their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :residence
house
. Constructing a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
building
 requires lots of money, time and efforts. From selecting a layout to choosing furniture, it is a rather
 tedious and long process. Also
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 don't consider using You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgrayancienttiredelderlydecrepitvenerable
old
 things in their brand You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
 home and that again accounts for an increase in expenditure. Moreover
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
 have beliefs and history associated with them. Consider an You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgrayancienttiredelderlydecrepitvenerable
old
 church which is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :nowadays
now
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demolishedruined
destroyed
 and replaced by a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
 one. Though this is a Possible spelling mistake found.positivepostie
postivie
 development, masses no longer supports this. They believe that the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgrayancienttiredelderlydecrepitvenerable
old
 church You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
building
 existed since quite Did you mean “a long time”?a long time
along time
 and it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assisted
helped
 them reminisce the history of town which this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
 one fails to.

Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?Thus,
Thus
to conclude
, I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 on the fact that constructs that are too aged should The modal verb ‘should’ requires the verb’s base form.demolish
demolished
 and replaces by a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
 one rather
 than maintaining an You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgrayancienttiredelderlydecrepitvenerable
old
 one. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
But
 for those who can't afford or those with history associated with a particular structure, restoration seems to be the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 option feasible and available. 