Some people believe that in the future the national borders between countries will disappear because of the becoming more mobile population. While this idea is true to a certain extent, I partly disagree with this opinion.
On the one hand, there are understandable why people support this idea. Firstly, in the modern area, the dollar is the global currency and it can be used in almost all countries, that leads to some countries which want to use the dollar as their currency trying to be a part of the USA. For example, China is trying to convince the government of the USA for allowing them to combine with and use the USA as their currency. In addition, a lot of young people always want to learn more about the culture they but the boundaries are the obstacles that they need to remove. For instance, in Viet Nam, a group of young people, usually present about the drawbacks of the border between Viet Nam and Laos and they do everything to convince the government for removing the border.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why I think this idea is not quite right. First, some countries, which do not have good relationships with their neighbors, consequently, they do not want to combine with other countries. An illustration of this is that the relationship between Viet Nam and China is quite bad. The residents in Viet Nam always have a bunch of conflicts with the resident in China. Moreover, removing the boundaries leads to several countries which are less developed will be controlled by the richer. As a consequence, the less developed countries can be lost their language. For example, Cambodia, which does not have a border between them and Thailand, they are losing their mother tongue and almost all their residents use Thai instead.
In conclusion, while some people side with the opinion about removing the national borders between countries by the mobile of population, I believe several aspects of this idea are not quite right and I partly disagree with this idea.
Some
people
believe that in the future the national
borders
between
countries
will disappear
because
of the becoming more mobile population. While this
idea
is true to a certain extent, I partly disagree with this opinion.
On the one hand, there are understandable why
people
support this
idea
.
Firstly
, in the modern area, the dollar is the global currency and it can be
used
in almost all
countries
, that leads to
some
countries
which want to
use
the dollar as their currency trying to be a part of the USA.
For example
, China is trying to convince the
government
of the USA for allowing them to combine with and
use
the USA as their currency.
In addition
,
a lot of
young
people
always want to learn more about the culture they
but
the boundaries are the obstacles that they need to remove.
For instance
, in
Viet
Nam, a group of young
people
,
usually
present about the drawbacks of the
border
between
Viet
Nam and
Laos and
they do everything to convince the
government
for removing the border.
On the other hand
, there are several reasons why I
think
this
idea
is not quite right.
First
,
some
countries
, which do not have
good
relationships with their neighbors,
consequently
, they do not want to combine with other
countries
. An illustration of this is that the relationship between
Viet
Nam and China is quite
bad
. The residents in
Viet
Nam always have a bunch of conflicts with the resident in China.
Moreover
, removing the boundaries leads to several
countries
which are less developed will
be controlled
by the richer. As a consequence, the less developed
countries
can
be lost
their language.
For example
, Cambodia, which does not have a
border
between them and Thailand, they are losing their mother tongue and almost all their residents
use
Thai
instead
.
In conclusion
, while
some
people
side with the opinion about removing the national
borders
between
countries
by the mobile of population, I believe several aspects of this
idea
are not quite right and I partly disagree with this
idea
.