Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people believe that in the future the national borders between countries will disappear because of the becoming more mobile population. While this idea is true to a certain extent, I partly disagree with this opinion.

Some people believe that in the future the national borders between countries will disappear because of the becoming more mobile population. While this idea is true to a certain extent, I partly disagree with this opinion. On the one hand, there are understandable why people support this idea. Firstly, in the modern area, the dollar is the global currency and it can be used in almost all countries, that leads to some countries which want to use the dollar as their currency trying to be a part of the USA. For example, China is trying to convince the government of the USA for allowing them to combine with and use the USA as their currency. In addition, a lot of young people always want to learn more about the culture they but the boundaries are the obstacles that they need to remove. For instance, in Viet Nam, a group of young people, usually present about the drawbacks of the border between Viet Nam and Laos and they do everything to convince the government for removing the border. On the other hand, there are several reasons why I think this idea is not quite right. First, some countries, which do not have good relationships with their neighbors, consequently, they do not want to combine with other countries. An illustration of this is that the relationship between Viet Nam and China is quite bad. The residents in Viet Nam always have a bunch of conflicts with the resident in China. Moreover, removing the boundaries leads to several countries which are less developed will be controlled by the richer. As a consequence, the less developed countries can be lost their language. For example, Cambodia, which does not have a border between them and Thailand, they are losing their mother tongue and almost all their residents use Thai instead. In conclusion, while some people side with the opinion about removing the national borders between countries by the mobile of population, I believe several aspects of this idea are not quite right and I partly disagree with this idea.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 believe that in the future the national You use this word too often, consider replacing it withboundarylineoutskirt
borders
 between You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 will disappear This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of the becoming more mobile population. While this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withconceptinterpretationdesignsensebeliefintention
idea
 is true to a certain extent, I partly disagree with this opinion.

On the one hand, there are understandable why You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 support this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withconceptinterpretationdesignsensebeliefintention
idea
. Firstly
, in the modern area, the dollar is the global currency and it can be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 in almost all You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
, that leads to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 which want to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 the dollar as their currency trying to be a part of the USA. For example
, China is trying to convince the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 of the USA for allowing them to combine with and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 the USA as their currency. In addition
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
a lot of
 young You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 always want to learn more about the culture they This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 the boundaries are the obstacles that they need to remove. For instance
, in Possible spelling mistake found.ViewDietVainVieVetVied
Viet
 Nam, a group of young You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
, usually
 present about the drawbacks of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withboundarylineoutskirt
border
 between Possible spelling mistake found.ViewDietVainVieVetVied
Viet
 Nam and Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).Laos, and
Laos and
 they do everything to convince the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 for removing the border.

On the other hand
, there are several reasons why I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withconceptinterpretationdesignsensebeliefintention
idea
 is not quite right. First
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
, which do not have This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 relationships with their neighbors, consequently
, they do not want to combine with other You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
. An illustration of this is that the relationship between Possible spelling mistake found.ViewDietVainVieVetVied
Viet
 Nam and China is quite This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evil
bad
. The residents in Possible spelling mistake found.ViewDietVainVieVetVied
Viet
 Nam always have a bunch of conflicts with the resident in China. Moreover
, removing the boundaries leads to several You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 which are less developed will be controlled
 by the richer. As a consequence, the less developed You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 can be lost
 their language. For example
, Cambodia, which does not have a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withboundarylineoutskirt
border
 between them and Thailand, they are losing their mother tongue and almost all their residents This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 Thai instead
.

In conclusion
, while This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 side with the opinion about removing the national You use this word too often, consider replacing it withboundarylineoutskirt
borders
 between You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 by the mobile of population, I believe several aspects of this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withconceptinterpretationdesignsensebeliefintention
idea
 are not quite right and I partly disagree with this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withconceptinterpretationdesignsensebeliefintention
idea
. 