Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that high position should be given to employees inside the company;not to someone from outside or new hiring.Don you think promoting an insider into a high position outwaight appointing an outsider?

Some people believe that high position should be given to employees inside the company; not to someone from outside or new hiring. Don you think promoting an insider into a high position outwaight appointing an outsider? qmrw
Competition between businesses, regardless of their size, has reached its peak over the pai decades. It is now, therefore, crucial to make the right choices when it comes to recruiting employees for high positions. Although some people think it is a good idea to hire someone, I strongly feel that it is much better to promote employees within. There are numerous reasoning's to suggest that promoting an insider is just the right choice. To begin with, employees working within the company have already proven their loyalty to the organisation, and are well-informed of the company polices. It could, therefore, be argued that promoting these personnel to high positions is likely to make them more loyal, which will guarantee higher productivity. Besides, appointing insiders, who are already well-acquainted with the work environment and the workforce, would guarantee teamwork, and thus greater efficiency. In addition, it almost always saves the company a pretty penny as they do not need to spend money on advertising or on arranging interviews and introductory training programmes. Some people, on the other hand, claim that recruiting from outside the company ensures greater chance to find the right person. They further insist that hiring external candidates would give the organisation a competitive advantage since it extends the possibility of the inflow of fresh talents and innovative ideas. I, however, would argue that experienced and skilled insiders do not lack innovation In conclusion, I strongly believe that, despite the supposed benefits of recruiting employees within into high positions outweighs hiring external candidates. EXERCISE-16 outsiders, promoting
Competition between businesses, regardless of their size, has reached its peak over the
Possible spelling mistake found.
pai
decades. It is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
,
therefore
, crucial to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
the right choices when it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
comes
to recruiting employees for high positions. Although
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
it is a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
to hire someone, I
strongly
feel that it is much better to promote employees within.

There are numerous reasoning's to suggest that promoting an insider is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
the right choice. To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, employees working within the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
have already proven their loyalty to the
Possible spelling mistake. 'organisation' is British English.
organisation
, and are well-informed of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
polices. It could,
therefore
,
be argued
that promoting these personnel to high positions is likely to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
them more loyal, which will guarantee higher productivity.
Besides
, appointing insiders, who are already well-acquainted with the work environment and the workforce, would guarantee teamwork, and
thus
greater efficiency.
In addition
, it almost always saves the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
a pretty penny as they do not need to spend money on advertising or on arranging interviews and introductory training
Possible spelling mistake. 'programmes' is British English.
programmes
.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
,
on the other hand
, claim that recruiting from outside the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
ensures greater

This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
chance
to find the right person. They
further
insist that hiring external candidates would give the
Possible spelling mistake. 'organisation' is British English.
organisation
a competitive advantage since it extends the possibility of the inflow of fresh talents and innovative
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ideas
. I,
however
, would argue that experienced and skilled insiders do not lack innovation
In conclusion
, I
strongly
believe that, despite the supposed benefits of recruiting

This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
employees
within into high positions outweighs hiring external candidates.

EXERCISE-16

outsiders, promoting
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people believe that high position should be given to employees inside the company; not to someone from outside or new hiring. Don you think promoting an insider into a high position outwaight appointing an outsider?

Essay
  American English
7 paragraphs
255 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Some people believe that high position should be given to employees inside the company;not to someone from outside or new hiring.Don you think promoting an insider into a high position outwaight appointing an outsider?