Some would argue that government authorities are entirely reasonable for unemployed and homeless people. I completely agree with this statement because the cabinet’s policies and plans are sometimes not thoughtful which affects people’s lives. Also, if the tax money had been used in a beneficial way, there would not be unemployment and people without a home.
To begin with, plans and policies passed by ministries are often not quite thoughtful as it has a significant effect on public. These laws affect the livelihood of common working-class individuals, especially the ones working labour jobs, through increased goods prices and unexpected changes that could alter daily routines. Although it affects educated skilled workers, they are not tremendously affected compared to the people doing blue-collar jobs. For example, the Indian government banned the usage of 500 and 1000 rupee notes a few years ago which resulted in a lot of people losing their jobs and some of them could not afford to pay home rents, and eventually had to vacate their rented places.
Furthermore, a government has sufficient funds to help the needy through the acquired tax money from their citizens. Therefore, they should consider the welfare of their society and individuals by helping such poor people. However, this is sometimes not the case in some countries as the tax money is not used for society’s benefits but to build tourist attractions. For instance, in Australia, they have a scheme called ‘Center Link’ through which these disadvantaged people are given money for their survival. Such a scheme can be extremely helpful for these people but why would some governments do not take such responsibilities?
In conclusion, I think authorities should take responsibility for helping people without jobs and homes as they were pushed to such states due to the implementation of bad regulations and decisions. Moreover, governments have sufficient funds required to improve the life of the needy.
Some
would argue that
government
authorities are
entirely
reasonable for unemployed and homeless
people
. I completely
agree
with this statement
because
the cabinet’s policies and plans are
sometimes
not thoughtful which affects
people’s
lives
.
Also
, if the tax
money
had been
used
in a beneficial way
, there would not be unemployment and
people
without a home.
To
begin
with, plans and policies passed by ministries are
often
not quite thoughtful as it has a significant effect on public. These laws affect the livelihood of common working-
class
individuals,
especially
the ones working
labour
jobs
, through increased
goods
prices and unexpected
changes
that could alter daily routines. Although it affects educated skilled workers, they are not
tremendously
affected
compared to the
people
doing blue-collar
jobs
.
For example
, the Indian
government
banned the usage of 500 and 1000 rupee notes a few years ago which resulted in
a lot of
people
losing their
jobs
and
some
of them could not afford to pay home rents, and
eventually
had to vacate their rented places.
Furthermore
, a
government
has sufficient funds to
help
the needy through the acquired tax
money
from their citizens.
Therefore
, they should consider the welfare of their society and individuals by helping such poor
people
.
However
, this is
sometimes
not the case in
some
countries as the tax
money
is not
used
for society’s benefits
but
to build tourist attractions.
For instance
, in Australia, they have a scheme called ‘Center Link’ through which these disadvantaged
people
are
given
money
for their survival. Such a scheme can be
extremely
helpful for these
people
but
why would
some
governments
do not take such responsibilities?
In conclusion
, I
think
authorities should take responsibility for helping
people
without
jobs
and homes as they
were pushed
to such states due to the implementation of
bad
regulations and decisions.
Moreover
,
governments
have sufficient funds required to
improve
the life of the needy.