Young people in certain parts of the US are restricted to go out at night, or they should be accompanied by an adult, after a particular time. I completely agree with this because it is not safe for children to be outdoors late at night, and they tend to be irresponsible when they are allowed to be on their own.
Youngsters are unsafe when they are outdoors during the night. Violent crimes have been rapidly increasing, particularly at night when most people are incautious and feel relaxed. Furthermore, it becomes easier for the offender to sneak and attack, which makes the victim vulnerable as the environment is dark and no one to rescue. Having said that, in most scenarios adolescents are unable to protect themselves, which makes them the most vulnerable group in society. For example, Teenage girls are often attacked and kidnapped in the US at night times when they go out to parties. So, it is safer to stay at home rather than to be out on their own after dark.
Most minors do not have the proper sense of responsibility due to their inexperience. Teens are enthusiastic and love to explore things that they are restricted to. In doing so, they often go off-limits unaware of the consequences, which lead them into serious trouble. Sometimes the effect can be a life-threatening situation as a result of their recklessness. For instance, numerous complaints have been filed in Australia to take action against drunk teenagers trespassing into private properties at late nights. It would be better for adolescents to remain indoors at night or have adult supervision when they are out.
In conclusion, I believe that the curfew is actually safeguarding the children at night, and it is the best practice to do. Going out at night can be dangerous and poor responsibility of the teens can have adverse effects on themselves, while it is better to stay safe at home during the nights.
Young
people
in certain parts of the US
are restricted
to go out at
night
, or they should
be accompanied
by an adult, after a particular time. I completely
agree
with this
because
it is not safe for children to be outdoors late at
night
, and they tend to be irresponsible when they are
allowed
to be on their
own
.
Youngsters are unsafe when they are outdoors during the
night
. Violent crimes have been
rapidly
increasing,
particularly
at
night
when most
people
are incautious and feel relaxed.
Furthermore
, it becomes easier for the offender to sneak and attack, which
makes
the victim vulnerable as the environment is dark and no one to rescue. Having said that, in most scenarios adolescents are unable to protect themselves, which
makes
them the most vulnerable group in society.
For example
, Teenage girls are
often
attacked and kidnapped in the US at
night times
when they go out to parties.
So
, it is safer to stay at home
rather
than to be out on their
own
after dark.
Most minors do not have the proper sense of responsibility due to their inexperience. Teens are enthusiastic and
love
to explore things that they
are restricted
to. In doing
so
, they
often
go off-limits unaware of the consequences, which lead them into serious trouble.
Sometimes
the effect can be a life-threatening situation
as a result
of their recklessness.
For instance
, numerous complaints have
been filed
in Australia to take action against drunk
teenagers
trespassing into private properties at late
nights
. It would be better for adolescents to remain indoors at
night
or have adult supervision when they are out.
In conclusion
, I believe that the curfew is actually safeguarding the children at
night
, and it is the best practice to do. Going out at
night
can be
dangerous
and poor responsibility of the teens can have adverse effects on themselves, while it is better to stay safe at home during the
nights
.