These days there are some people say that we can reduce crime rates by giving longer prison judgement and that is the best way to reduce crimes. While others believe that we have a lot of methods to crack down on crime and these methods are really better than long prison judging. I will discuss both sides in this essay and will draw my personal conclusion.
In one hand, we have people say that we could cracking down on crimes by giving longer prison judging. They say that more time guilty spend in prison is more likely to start think that they must change them behivour. For example, in prison you have more time to stay with yourself and start thinking that you right or wrong, you need to start a new life, you need to be good person, and that lead to change them conduct. So, thats why some think that this way is the best way to solve crimes issues.
On the other hand, they say that there are more likely way to solve that crimes problems. And we have a lot of ways and I will talk about one method as an example, and it is society work. To illustrate, if someone arrested for having some forbidden materials. We can punish them by clean a graden for two weeks, take part in a charity for a month or anything like this. They also say that this method will benifit the guilty and community. Hence the belief that there more affective ways to reduce crimes.
In addition, we have to put more effort to fight the sources of these crimes. For an instance, to fight back stealing we need to fight back poverty, start put more taxes on rich people in society and try to push economy and services. This proves clearly that we have better ways to cracking crimes.
In conclusion, after a careful analysis of both views point, I believe that we should start fighting the sources of these problems and actually we have more affective ways to reduce our crime rates.
These days there are
some
people
say that we can
reduce
crime
rates by giving longer
prison
judgement and
that is
the best
way
to
reduce
crimes
. While others believe that we have
a lot of
methods
to crack down on
crime
and these
methods
are
really
better than long
prison
judging. I will discuss both sides in this essay and will draw my personal conclusion.
In one hand, we have
people
say that we could
cracking
down on
crimes
by giving longer
prison
judging. They say that more time guilty spend in
prison
is more likely to
start
think
that they
must
change
them
behivour
.
For example
, in
prison
you have more time to stay with yourself and
start
thinking that you right or
wrong
, you need to
start
a new life, you need to be
good
person, and that lead to
change
them conduct.
So
,
thats
why
some
think
that this
way
is the best
way
to solve
crimes
issues.
On the other hand
, they say that there are more likely
way
to solve that
crimes
problems. And we have
a lot of
ways
and I will talk about one
method
as an example, and it is society work. To illustrate, if someone arrested for having
some
forbidden materials. We can punish them by clean a
graden
for two weeks,
take part
in a charity for a month or anything like this. They
also
say that this
method
will
benifit
the guilty and community.
Hence
the belief that there more affective
ways
to
reduce
crimes.
In addition
, we
have to
put more effort to fight the sources of these
crimes
. For an instance, to fight back stealing we need to fight back poverty,
start
put more taxes on rich
people
in society and try to push economy and services. This proves
clearly
that we have better
ways
to cracking crimes.
In conclusion
, after a careful analysis of both views point, I believe that we should
start
fighting the sources of these problems and actually we have more affective
ways
to
reduce
our
crime
rates.