It is ambiguous whether machines will take-away the human workforce entirely. While it is possible that labour-intensive tasks and one demanding a high level of accuracy will be gradually taken up by robots, it is unlikely that the jobs requiring human intervention will be taken over. In my view few tasks will still be carried out manually.
Firstly, more and more machines are replacing humans in the realm of production, defence, and so on. Although it could be very pricey to deploy such robots, they are inevitable because of their precision, programmable nature, swiftness and other qualities, which is impracticable for humans to possess. Examples can be seen in the assembly units of electronics where machines are reprogrammed after each job for another product. Furthermore, robots are more productive than humans, which aid to curb production cost resulting more profitability. For instance, assembling a microchip, call for a consistent level of accuracy and speed concurrently, which is unrealisable manually and could be indeed costly. It seems agreeable that with technology advancements the scope of robots will rise together with its limitations.
Moreover, despite of their ability to perform well, it would not be feasible for robots take-up humans in the areas demanding mental abilities, especially: testing edible items, perfumes, ability to debate or perform research work and so on. For instance, weather restoring vital components of a hovering satellite, or for delivering managerial lectures humans will be mandatory. Thus, it looks obvious that humans will be necessary for some jobs in the future, however their role will remain limited.
To conclude, though it appears that the utility of robots will increase significantly, I believe that the interference of humans will be mandatory to overcome their limitations. Consequently, few jobs will continue to be dominated by the humans undoubtedly.
It is ambiguous whether machines will take-away the
human
workforce
entirely
. While it is possible that
labour-intensive
tasks and one demanding a high level of accuracy will be
gradually
taken up by robots, it is unlikely that the
jobs
requiring
human
intervention will
be taken
over. In my view few tasks will
still
be carried
out
manually
.
Firstly
, more and more machines are replacing
humans
in the realm of production,
defence
, and
so
on. Although it could be
very
pricey to deploy such robots, they are inevitable
because
of their precision, programmable nature, swiftness and other qualities, which is impracticable for
humans
to possess. Examples can be
seen
in the assembly units of electronics where machines
are reprogrammed
after each
job
for another product.
Furthermore
, robots are more productive than
humans
, which aid to curb production cost resulting more profitability.
For instance
, assembling a microchip, call for a consistent level of accuracy and speed
concurrently
, which is
unrealisable
manually
and could be
indeed
costly. It seems agreeable that with technology advancements the scope of robots will rise together with its limitations.
Moreover
,
despite of
their ability to perform well, it would not be feasible for robots take-up
humans
in the areas demanding mental abilities,
especially
: testing edible items, perfumes, ability to debate or perform research work and
so
on.
For instance
, weather restoring vital components of a hovering satellite, or for delivering managerial lectures
humans
will be mandatory.
Thus
, it looks obvious that
humans
will be necessary for
some
jobs
in the future,
however
their role will remain limited.
To conclude
, though it appears that the utility of robots will increase
significantly
, I believe that the interference of
humans
will be mandatory to overcome their limitations.
Consequently
, few
jobs
will continue to
be dominated
by the
humans
undoubtedly
.
Funny
Love
Wow
Angry
Sad