Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people believe that companies and private individuals should be made to pay to clean up pollution.Tp what extent do you agree?

Some people believe that companies and private individuals should be made to pay to clean up pollution. Tp what extent do you agree? 6LyRG

There is a strong opinion which advocates that the business corporates as well as the common citizens of a country should bear the onus of cleaning up the environment and that they should be taxed for this. However there is almost equally passionate contrary view too. Let us through some light on both schools of thought to see things in right perspective. The most preponderant point in the favour of the former view is that the humongunous firms and their factories spew out lots of polluted water as well as air and thus should be taxed to correct the situation. The common denizens too cannot escape as he too has contributed to the mess by careless use of electrical gadgets as well as motorised vehicles. Taking my point further this will make every stakeholder more responsible and accountable. Moreover this will pull the planet back from the brink of self-destructionThis will reduce our carbon foot print which is of utmost important today. For Instance, If the government of the planet put a stop at the production of vehicles run by the fossil fuels and replace them with battery operated ones, pollution will automatically fall. Albeit I am compelled to play the devil's advocate too. The most vital point is that if it is within the power of government to stop or reduce all kinds of pollution and thus stop the emission of green house gases. The individual has very little to do with it. All said and done i reckon that both sides of the debate have some undeniable merit. On the one hand the regimes are all powerful and can easily control pollution without taxing the common man. On the other hand there seems to be a clinching evidence that the big factories as well, the small household er both cause irrepairable damage to our once pristine clean environment and thus should bear the cross of cleaning it. I too, thus, am inclined to be at par with the latter veiw.

There is a strong opinion which advocates that the business Possible spelling mistake found.corporatecorp orates
corporates
 as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrongtogether
well
 as the common citizens of a country should bear the onus of cleaning up the environment and that they should be taxed
 for this. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?However,
However
 there is almost equally
 passionate contrary view too. This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :authorize
Let
 us through This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 light on both schools of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonedassumedbelievedconsidered
thought
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witness
see
 things in right perspective. The most preponderant point in the Possible spelling mistake. 'favour' is British English.favor
favour
 of the former view is that the Possible spelling mistake found.humongous
humongunous
 firms and their factories spew out lots of polluted water as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrongtogether
well
 as air and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withso
thus
 should be taxed
 to correct the situation. The common denizens too cannot escape as he too has contributed to the mess by careless This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 of electrical gadgets as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrongtogether
well
 as Possible spelling mistake. 'motorised' is British English.motorized
motorised
 vehicles. Taking my point further
 this will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 every stakeholder more responsible and accountable. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?Moreover,
Moreover
 this will pull the planet back from the brink of Possible spelling mistake found.
self-destructionThis
 will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviate
reduce
 our carbon foot print which is of utmost This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:vitalcriticalessential
important
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :this day and agenowadays
today
. For Instance
, If the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 of the planet put a This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :terminateceasediscontinue
stop
 at the production of vehicles run by the fossil fuels and replace them with battery operated ones, pollution will automatically
 fall. Albeit I am compelled
 to play the devil's advocate too. The most vital point is that if it is within the power of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :terminateceasediscontinue
stop
 or This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviate
reduce
 all kinds of pollution and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withso
thus
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :terminateceasediscontinue
stop
 the emission of green This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :residence
house
 gases. The individual has This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
little
 to do with it. All said and done Is this the personal pronoun "I"? It is spelled uppercase.I
i
 reckon that both sides of the debate have This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 undeniable merit. On the one hand the regimes are all powerful and can easily
 control pollution without taxing the common This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualresidentcitizen
man
. On the other hand
 there seems to be a clinching evidence that the This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hugeenormousgiganticvast
big
 factories as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrongtogether
well
, the This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
small
 household er both cause Possible spelling mistake found.irreparable
irrepairable
 damage to our once pristine clean environment and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withso
thus
 should bear the cross of cleaning it. I too, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withso
thus
, am inclined
 to be at par with the latter Possible spelling mistake found.lawsawviewvanrawjaw
veiw
. 