While some companies give the employees' dress high concern, many focus on the productivity of their staff rather than clothes. Personally, I reckon that performance is much more important than appearance since it is the profitable and productive effort.
On the one hand, in spite of the fact that appearance might have some advantages, many still insistent that performance is more important. Due to the fact that the reward of the company is related to staff behavior, various companies allow to their members to wear freely. Furthermore, many managers are aware that once the people are forced to do something, they would inevitably hate it. In light of this, peoples' concentration would be distracted in case they were obligated to wear according to fixed pattern; therefore, this threatens their satisfaction and comfort, and consequently, their achievements.
On the other hand, due to the merits of the uniform, numerous companies incite their employees to have fixed-clothes style. For instance, as uniform reflects the cohesion and harmony between the individuals among a party, a lot of collaboration is conceivable in such environments. Thus, the positive consequences of the dress approach are unhidden. Moreover, when new visitors or consumers come to the firm for the first time, fixed clothing system reflects the organization and tidiness of the company. This would positive impact on the firm income and marker contribution. However; collaboration between people can be achieved once the employees are financially, for example, satisfied. Also, organization of company can be reflected easily by different architecture tactics.
In conclusion, although some companies are so keen about its members' clothes, vast majority relies more on performance. I argue that, productivity is more important than appearance in term of outcomes and focus.
While
some
companies
give the employees' dress high concern,
many
focus on the productivity of their staff
rather
than clothes.
Personally
, I reckon that performance is much more
important
than appearance since it is the profitable and productive effort.
On the one hand,
in spite of
the fact that appearance might have
some
advantages,
many
still
insistent that performance is more
important
. Due to the fact that the reward of the
company
is related
to staff behavior, various
companies
allow
to their members to wear
freely
.
Furthermore
,
many
managers are aware that once the
people
are forced
to do something, they would
inevitably
hate it. In light of this, peoples' concentration would
be distracted
in case they
were obligated
to wear according to
fixed
pattern;
therefore
, this threatens their satisfaction and comfort, and
consequently
, their achievements.
On the other hand
, due to the merits of the uniform, numerous
companies
incite their employees to have
fixed
-clothes style.
For instance
, as uniform reflects the cohesion and harmony between the individuals among a party,
a lot of
collaboration is conceivable in such environments.
Thus
, the
positive
consequences of the dress approach are unhidden.
Moreover
, when new visitors or consumers
come
to the firm for the
first
time,
fixed
clothing system reflects the organization and tidiness of the
company
. This would
positive
impact on the firm income and marker contribution.
However
; collaboration between
people
can
be achieved
once the employees are
financially
,
for example
, satisfied.
Also
, organization of
company
can
be reflected
easily
by
different
architecture tactics.
In conclusion
, although
some
companies
are
so
keen about its members' clothes, vast majority relies more on performance. I argue that, productivity is more
important
than appearance in term of outcomes and focus.