In this contemporary era, many countries are suffering with increased crime rate, and they are trying to reduce crimes. Some people believed that they should increase police on the street and it is the best solution to reduce crime rate. I partially disagree with the statement and discuss some reasons behind this in the subsequent paragraphs.
Some people think that increasing number of police troop on the crime suffered street is the best solution but there are so many consequences. Firstly, if government may increase police patrolling in the cities, it will lead higher cost or liabilities on the government. Nowadays, fossil fuels are increased in price and all money of fuels will be utilized from collected tax. Secondly, troops will not attain all places and all the time so that if any criminal want to do crime at any place than he will do that when police will not there.
Lastly, in some developing countries, police servant also do crimes like corruption. In addition, corruption is highly performed by government servants. For instance, a survay conducted by Times of India newspaper, they wrote in their article that police are increasing corruption in their service. They help criminals in their activities as they will get a number of number money.
Antagonistically, there are plenty of alternatives like technologies, employment and education. Education plays pivotal role in criminal activities. Some countries increase employment rate and this also resulted in decrement of the crime rate. In today's technological world, there are CCTV and surveillance systems which help to control crime as well as investigate crimes and also track criminals.
in conclusion, increment of police troops is not a proper solution but government should see all alternatives, because education and employment factors affect directly to reduce crime rate.
In this contemporary era,
many
countries are suffering with increased
crime
rate
, and they are trying to
reduce
crimes
.
Some
people
believed that they should increase
police
on the street and it is the best solution to
reduce
crime
rate
. I
partially
disagree with the statement and discuss
some
reasons behind this in the subsequent paragraphs.
Some
people
think
that increasing number of
police
troop on the
crime
suffered street is the best solution
but
there are
so
many
consequences.
Firstly
, if
government
may increase
police
patrolling in the cities, it will lead higher cost or liabilities on the
government
. Nowadays, fossil fuels
are increased
in price and all money of fuels will
be utilized
from collected tax.
Secondly
, troops will not attain all places and all the time
so
that if any criminal want to do
crime
at any place than he will do that when
police
will not there.
Lastly
, in
some
developing countries
,
police
servant
also
do
crimes
like corruption.
In addition
, corruption is
highly
performed by
government
servants.
For instance
, a
survay
conducted by Times of India newspaper, they wrote in their article that
police
are increasing corruption in their service. They
help
criminals in their activities as they will
get
a number of number money.
Antagonistically
, there are
plenty
of alternatives like technologies, employment and education. Education plays pivotal role in criminal activities.
Some
countries increase employment
rate
and this
also
resulted in decrement of the
crime
rate
. In
today
's technological world, there are CCTV and surveillance systems which
help
to control
crime
as well
as investigate
crimes
and
also
track
criminals.
in
conclusion, increment of
police
troops is not a proper solution
but
government
should
see
all alternatives,
because
education and employment factors affect
directly
to
reduce
crime
rate
.