A portion of people believe that there shouldn't be any capital punishment how serious the crime may be. In contrast, some people argue that punishments must be implemented strictly. In this essay we will be discussing about both the views. In my opinion the punishments must be based the intesity of the crime committed by an individual.
Firstly, by preventing the capital punishment there will be a scope for investigation authority to get furthur details related to crime. This may act as an reference to investigate the case more deeply and look for other individuals who are part of the crime. In most of the cases a crime is planned by a group of people with similar mindsets. For instance, a plot is designed to murder a respectful politician by a group. By carefully looking into the cases and drawing useful conclusions would surely help to solve the case with ease.
Secondly, capital punishment should be strictly implemented as it mark fear in people who may think of commiting a crime and also prevents the culprit from commiting furthur crimes. People become aware of the kind of punishment be imposed if a serious crime is commited. This awareness keeps people to abide by law and follow the prescribed rules and regulations. This helps in reduction of crime rate and also helps in maintaining harmony in the society.
I think it's not always advisable to implement capital punishment because it prevents the culprit to realise the impact of crime that has been commited. Just by haging a person to death may not solely justified. Most painful punishments must be implemented in the case of people who commit serious crimes.
To conclude, capital punishment may not be completely accepted but it instills the fear in brains of people. I beleive painful physical punishments should be implimented in the place of capital punishment.
A portion of
people
believe that there shouldn't be any
capital
punishment
how serious the
crime
may be.
In contrast
,
some
people
argue that
punishments
must
be implemented
strictly
. In this essay we will be
discussing about both
the views.
In
my opinion the
punishments
must
be based
the
intesity
of the
crime
committed by an individual.
Firstly
, by preventing the
capital
punishment
there will be a scope for investigation authority to
get
furthur
details
related to
crime
. This may act as
an
reference to investigate the case more
deeply
and look for other individuals who are part of the
crime
. In most of the cases a
crime
is planned
by a group of
people
with similar mindsets.
For instance
, a plot
is designed
to murder a respectful politician by a group. By
carefully
looking into the cases and drawing useful conclusions would
surely
help
to solve the case with
ease
.
Secondly
,
capital
punishment
should be
strictly
implemented as it mark fear in
people
who may
think
of
commiting
a
crime
and
also
prevents
the culprit from
commiting
furthur
crimes
.
People
become aware of the kind of
punishment
be imposed
if a serious
crime
is
commited
. This awareness
keeps
people
to abide by law and follow the prescribed
rules
and regulations. This
helps
in reduction of
crime
rate and
also
helps
in maintaining harmony in the society.
I
think
it's not always advisable to implement
capital
punishment
because
it
prevents
the culprit to
realise
the impact of
crime
that has been
commited
.
Just
by
haging
a person to death may not
solely
justified
. Most painful
punishments
must
be implemented
in the case of
people
who commit serious crimes.
To conclude
,
capital
punishment
may not be completely
accepted
but
it instills the fear in brains of
people
. I
beleive
painful physical
punishments
should be
implimented
in the place of
capital
punishment
.