Nowadays, the subject of whether it is an absolute necessity for children to possess a domestic animal or not is highly contentious in a way that has provoked heated arguments among its opponents and proponents. Nevertheless, there are rational justifications on both sides of this topical debate which will be discussed in details, followed by a concluding view on the matter.
On the one hand, the supporters of pet ownership point out that those children who are taking care of pets are more likely to take in some valuable skills, including patience and responsibility which are incredibly beneficial for their future. For instance, training a pet can be a lesson in patience since they will not act as children’s wish all the time, or even feeding and bathing them regularly can foster children’s sense of responsibility. Moreover, it is often stated that pets help kids to lead an active and healthy lifestyle, particularly in today’s technologically-focused world that children show a greater tendency to watch television or play video games for hours.
On the other hand, those who are opposed to this mindset highlight the huge financial burden accrued from owing a pet. In other words, maintaining pets imposes enormous expenses on families which range from veterinary costs to their foods; consequently, not many families are able to bear such expenditures. Additionally, the time involved in looking after them is worth taking into account. That is to say, a massive amount of time is required for nurturing them, and it is blatantly obvious they are parents who need to take most of the heat; therefore, if parents are suffering from adequate time, they fail to live up to this responsibility.
To conclude, it would appear that children can benefit considerably form keeping a pet, from mastering some absolutely essential skills to avoiding a sedentary life, provided that their families can meet the cost of health care and medical care of pets as well as the time entailed protecting them.
Nowadays, the subject of whether it is an absolute necessity for
children
to possess a domestic animal or not is
highly
contentious in a way that has provoked heated arguments among its opponents and proponents.
Nevertheless
, there are rational justifications on both sides of this topical debate which will
be discussed
in
details
, followed by a concluding view on the matter.
On the one hand, the supporters of pet ownership point out that those
children
who are taking care of
pets
are more likely to take in
some
valuable
skills
, including patience and responsibility which are
incredibly
beneficial for their future.
For instance
, training a pet can be a lesson in patience since they will not act as
children’s
wish all the
time
, or even feeding and bathing them
regularly
can foster
children’s
sense of responsibility.
Moreover
, it is
often
stated that
pets
help
kids to lead an active and healthy lifestyle,
particularly
in
today
’s
technologically
-focused world that
children
show
a greater tendency to
watch
television or play video games for hours.
On the other hand
, those who
are opposed
to this mindset highlight the huge financial burden accrued from owing a pet.
In other words
, maintaining
pets
imposes enormous expenses on families which range from veterinary costs to their foods;
consequently
, not
many
families are able to bear such expenditures.
Additionally
, the
time
involved in looking after them is worth taking into account.
That is
to say, a massive amount of
time
is required
for nurturing them, and it is
blatantly
obvious they are parents who need to take most of the heat;
therefore
, if parents are suffering from adequate
time
, they fail to
live
up to this responsibility.
To conclude
, it would appear that
children
can benefit
considerably
form keeping a pet, from mastering
some
absolutely
essential
skills
to avoiding a sedentary life, provided that their families can
meet
the cost of health care and medical care of
pets
as well
as the
time
entailed protecting them.