Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe space travel is a frivolous endeavor, wasting money and human ingenuity, never mind dangerous to boot. Therefore, our focus should be on saving and solving problems on planet Earth first. Others believe it to be a worthwhile venture, much like the pioneering efforts with early flying machines many decades ago, ultimately giving us solutions to Earth's problems. Which opinion do you support? And why?

Some people believe space travel is a frivolous endeavor, wasting money and human ingenuity, never mind dangerous to boot. Therefore, our focus should be on saving and solving problems on planet Earth first. Others believe it to be a worthwhile venture, much like the pioneering efforts with early flying machines many decades ago, ultimately giving us solutions to Earth's problems. Which opinion do you support? And why? lLrQJ
Due to developments in aerospace technology, space voyages have become a reality. In the past, conservationists have spent vast sums of money on space exploration, while critical social issues arise on our planet. However, the public funding devoted to the development of technology for space exploration does not provide any benefits for our society, therefore the government should place an emphasis on funding education, critical social issues, and environmental conservation. The biggest downside of space travel is that it might have a huge impact on the Earth's climate. Climate change is the average weather at a given point and time of year, over a long period. For the last few decades, existential threats such as the extinction of the animals such as dinosaurs due to climate change, and global warming led to ice melt at the poles. The ozone layer is thinning because of the emission of CFCs, and the hole is widening. For instance, NASA satellite data revealed a frightening and growing hole in the ozone layer over the South Pole (1987) leading to health, crops, and biodiversity loss. They are devoting the best minds to exploring other planets rather than saving this one. Instead of rescuing this world, they are diverting the brightest minds to exploring distant planets. This useless undertaking consumes a lot of time, energy, and money, when there are plainly numerous crises on Earth that must be addressed first. There are many existing problems on Earth, and trying to find something new may not guarantee that those problems will be treated. So, instead of spending money on things that people are not fully aware of, humans need to find a solution to solve these problems, that should be maintained parallel with these problems on the Earth. Despite the fact that the effects are disastrous, scientists do not mean stop developing space technology. In conclusion, this is a difficult issue because, while space travel is important, it seems hard to justify the vast amounts of money spent on it. Technology for space exploration is a waste of scarce resources due to its effects on the atmosphere and lack of immediate advantages; therefore, national leaders should prioritize environmental conservation. While space technology is not far off, the critics are correct, but that does not mean that space technology should be used to solve all of the world's issues. Space technology will be crucial in the future expansion of new things.
Due to developments in aerospace
technology
,
space
voyages have become a reality. In the past, conservationists have spent vast sums of
money
on
space
exploration, while critical social
issues
arise on our planet.
However
, the public funding devoted to the development of
technology
for
space
exploration does not provide any benefits for our society,
therefore
the
government
should place an emphasis on funding education, critical social
issues
, and environmental conservation.

The biggest downside of
space
travel is that it might have a huge impact on the Earth's climate. Climate
change
is the average weather at a
given
point and time of year, over a long period. For the last few decades, existential threats such as the extinction of the animals such as dinosaurs due to climate
change
, and global warming led to ice melt at the poles. The ozone layer is thinning
because
of the emission of
CFCs
, and the hole is widening.
For instance
, NASA satellite data revealed a frightening and growing hole in the ozone layer over the South Pole (1987) leading to health, crops, and biodiversity loss. They are devoting the best minds to exploring other planets
rather
than saving this one.
Instead
of rescuing this world, they are diverting the brightest minds to exploring distant planets.

This useless undertaking consumes
a lot of
time, energy, and
money
, when there are
plainly
numerous crises on Earth that
must
be addressed
first
. There are
many
existing
problems
on Earth, and trying to find something new may not guarantee that those
problems
will
be treated
.
So
,
instead
of spending
money
on things that
people
are not
fully
aware of, humans need to find a solution to solve these
problems
, that should
be maintained
parallel with these
problems
on the Earth. Despite the fact that the effects are disastrous, scientists do not mean
stop
developing
space
technology.

In conclusion
, this is a difficult
issue
because
, while
space
travel is
important
, it seems
hard
to justify the vast amounts of
money
spent on it.
Technology
for
space
exploration is a waste of scarce resources due to its effects on the atmosphere and lack of immediate advantages;
therefore
, national leaders should prioritize environmental conservation. While
space
technology
is not far off, the critics are correct,
but
that does not mean that
space
technology
should be
used
to solve
all of the
world's
issues
.
Space
technology
will be crucial in the future expansion of new things.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people believe space travel is a frivolous endeavor, wasting money and human ingenuity, never mind dangerous to boot. Therefore, our focus should be on saving and solving problems on planet Earth first. Others believe it to be a worthwhile venture, much like the pioneering efforts with early flying machines many decades ago, ultimately giving us solutions to Earth's problems. Which opinion do you support? And why?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
403 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts