Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people argued that smoking should be banned but on another side that is no good . What is your opinion ?

Some people argued that smoking should be banned but on another side that is no good. What is your opinion? PVLpJ

Smoking is dangerous for the health of both active as well as a passive smoker. Thereby, it's been argued that smoking should be completely banned, but it would not be reasonable to smokers. Hence some alternatives have been followed to conquer the adverse effect of smoking on the others life. To start with, there is no doubt, taking a breath in effective air by cigarette is as dangerous for individual as one person who is smoking. Consequently, Not only smoker's life in danger, but, all people's lives who are involved in surrounding, because of its cause thousand patients with cancer is fighting for their life, every day. Moreover toxic ingredients in cigarette pollution to air when that is air inhaled by respiratory patient, children, pregnant women for a long time, that works as position. As a result, baby born with this condition might suffer many disorders. On the other side, a total prohibition on the smoking is unfair to cigarette consumers. It is like snatching their freedom from them. According to the survey, 80% addicted people start their day with smoking. Without smoking they can not be able to provide good performance. There would be a big chance of loss in productivity Keeping all aspects in mind, there is a plethora of alternatives to tackle this situation. First of all, awareness among people can solve plenty of problems. As a result, some people might be quiet smoking. Moreover they start avoiding public places at smoking time. Last but not least, there must be rules, regulation such as fat penalty for a person who is caught smoking in public place. In the conclusion, smoking should not be banned because it would not be fair with addicted people. But it should be banned at public place. For this government and individuals need to come together to face this problem.

You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
Smoking
 is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hazardousrisky
dangerous
 for the health of both active Probable usage error. Use "and" after 'both'.and
as well as
 a passive smoker. Thereby, it's been argued
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 should be completely banned, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 it would not be reasonable to smokers. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?Hence,
Hence
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 alternatives have been followed
 to conquer the adverse effect of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 on the Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean "others'" or "other's"?others'other's
others
 life.

To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiate
start
 with, there is no doubt, taking a breath in effective air by cigarette is as This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hazardousrisky
dangerous
 for individual as one person who is You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
. Consequently
, Not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 smoker's life in This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardrisk
danger
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
, all This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
's This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
 who are involved
 in surrounding, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of its cause Use "a thousand" or use a number before 'thousand'.a thousand
thousand
 patients with cancer is fighting for their life, every day. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?Moreover,
Moreover
 toxic ingredients in cigarette pollution to air when that is
 air inhaled by respiratory patient, children, pregnant women for a long time, that works as position. As a result
, baby born with this condition might suffer This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 disorders.

On the other side, a total prohibition on the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 is unfair to cigarette consumers. It is like snatching their freedom from them. According to the survey, 80% addicted You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiate
start
 their day with You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
. Without The comma is probably missing here: "smoking, they".smoking, they
smoking they
 can not be able to provide This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 performance. There would be a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hugeenormousgiganticvast
big
 chance of loss in Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraphproductivity.productivity!productivity?productivity:productivity,productivity;
productivity


Keeping all aspects in mind, there is a plethora of alternatives to tackle this situation. This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".First
First of all
, awareness among You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 can solve This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:abundance
plenty
 of problems. As a result
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 might be quiet You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?Moreover,
Moreover
 they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiate
start
 avoiding public places at You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 time. Last This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 not least, there This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
 be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirements
rules
, regulation such as This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :chubby
fat
 penalty for a person who is caught
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 in public place.

In the conclusion, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 should not be banned
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 it would not be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :equitable
fair
 with addicted You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
But
 it should be banned
 at public place. For this This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 and individuals need to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :approacharrive
come
 together to face this problem. 