Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

some people argue that there should be fixed punishment for committing a certain crime for all criminal.Others suggest that the condition is considered before declaring any punishment.Do agree with the statement?

some people argue that there should be fixed punishment for committing a certain crime for all criminal. Others suggest that the condition is considered before declaring any punishment. Do agree with the statement? qVRpX
Declaring the type of punishment to the perpetrators is one of the issues that authorities have a variety of ideas about that. Some individuals believe that penalties should be the same for all law-offenders in the certain offence, however, many people think that the situation of criminal activity should be considered for punishing. I completely agree with the give statement with the basis of control of crime rate and upbringing to a better lifestyle. To begin with, the main reason is that the type of penalty is a determining factor of reducing criminal activities. To simply put, providing that reviewers declare definite punishment for every criminal, then under no circumstances is it possible to reduce crimes, because they already introduced every guilty person as a perpetrator. Take an individual that showed aggressive behaviour for the first time as an example; convicting him or her as a law-offender and sending him to imprisonment, as a rule, not only is not more likely to control crime, but it would add a new name to the criminal list. Thus, the more flexibility in penalties for offences, the better control in the amount of them. Having said that, however, decreasing of crime is not the only crucial factor in this respect. Another causative reason is that flexibility in types of punishments is a rewarding factor for superior treating of law-offenders. That is to say, by using different methods to punish the criminals, it tends to be possible to prepare environments that guilty person learns and upbringing their aggressive behaviour. A good illustration for this is clearly shown by employing social punishments such as participate in charitable activities. Therefore, if penalties declare by considering of personality of criminals, they would be oriented to the correct lifestyle. To Conclude, I personally take the view that it is ethically unacceptable to have an equal penalty for certain offence for every criminal. This is mainly because of reducing a number of crime and guide them to a better life.
Declaring the type of
punishment
to the perpetrators is one of the issues that authorities have a variety of
ideas
about that.
Some
individuals believe that
penalties
should be the same for all law-offenders in the certain
offence
,
however
,
many
people
think
that the situation of
criminal
activity should
be considered
for punishing. I completely
agree
with the give statement with the basis of control of
crime
rate and upbringing to a better lifestyle.

To
begin
with, the main reason is that the type of
penalty
is a determining factor of reducing
criminal
activities. To
simply
put, providing that reviewers declare
definite
punishment
for every
criminal
, then under no circumstances is it possible to
reduce
crimes
,
because
they already introduced every guilty person as a perpetrator. Take an individual that
showed
aggressive
behaviour
for the
first
time as an example; convicting him or her as a law-offender and sending him to imprisonment, as a
rule
, not
only
is not more likely to control
crime
,
but
it would
add
a new name to the
criminal
list.
Thus
, the more flexibility in
penalties
for
offences
, the better control in the amount of them.

Having said that,
however
, decreasing of
crime
is not the
only
crucial factor in this respect. Another causative reason is that flexibility in types of
punishments
is a rewarding factor for superior treating of law-offenders.
That is
to say, by using
different
methods to punish the
criminals
, it tends to be possible to prepare environments that guilty person learns and upbringing their aggressive
behaviour
. A
good
illustration for this is
clearly
shown by employing social
punishments
such as participate in charitable activities.
Therefore
, if
penalties
declare by considering of personality of
criminals
, they would
be oriented
to the correct lifestyle.

To Conclude
, I
personally
take the view that it is
ethically
unacceptable to have an equal
penalty
for certain
offence
for every
criminal
. This is
mainly
because
of reducing a number of
crime
and guide them to a better life.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay some people argue that there should be fixed punishment for committing a certain crime for all criminal. Others suggest that the condition is considered before declaring any punishment. Do agree with the statement?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
331 words
7
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts