It has been argued that providing incentives to school educators to promote teaching products should not be allowed. Although ethical questions can be raised, I am of the opinion that rewarding teachers in this way has more benefits than drawbacks.
There are several concerns associated with teachers receiving perks in exchange for educational resource promotion. First of all, teachers may end up promoting unproven or even ineffective teaching products. If an influential or ‘celebrity’ teacher is offered money or other material benefits in exchange for product recommendations, it is highly likely that money rather than research will decide the teaching approaches that educators will take in the long term. Secondly, many would argue that teachers have no place in sales or marketing. From this perspective, teachers are expected to focus only on the important job of teaching their class.
However, rewarding teachers for their promotion of products has significant advantages. Firstly, it is well known that a major problem with a career in education is the lack of opportunity for advancement. If teachers can become more influential or wealthier due to hard work and experimentation with new resources, education may again become a desired career. In addition, part of the rewards teachers receive is often free resources for their schools and classrooms. Seeing that most schools are running tight budgets, any situation that leads to schools and teachers having more resources at their disposal must be advantageous.
In conclusion, while using teachers as promotional tools is not ideal, this system allows teaching to become a more attractive profession and schools to be more well-resourced. Therefore, I believe that these incentives are acceptable.
It has
been argued
that providing incentives to
school
educators to promote
teaching
products
should not be
allowed
. Although ethical questions can
be raised
, I am of the opinion that rewarding
teachers
in this way has more benefits than drawbacks.
There are several concerns associated with
teachers
receiving perks in exchange for educational
resource
promotion.
First of all
,
teachers
may
end
up promoting unproven or even ineffective
teaching
products
. If an influential or ‘celebrity’
teacher
is offered
money or other material benefits in exchange for
product
recommendations, it is
highly
likely that money
rather
than research will decide the
teaching
approaches that educators will take in the long term.
Secondly
,
many
would argue that
teachers
have no place in sales or marketing. From this perspective,
teachers
are
expected
to focus
only
on the
important
job of
teaching
their
class
.
However
, rewarding
teachers
for their promotion of
products
has significant advantages.
Firstly
, it is well known that a major problem with a career in education is the lack of opportunity for advancement. If
teachers
can become more influential or wealthier due to
hard
work and experimentation with new resources, education may again become a desired career.
In addition
, part of the rewards
teachers
receive is
often
free resources for their
schools
and classrooms. Seeing that most
schools
are running tight budgets, any situation that leads to
schools
and
teachers
having more resources at their disposal
must
be advantageous.
In conclusion
, while using
teachers
as promotional tools is not ideal, this system
allows
teaching
to become a more attractive profession and
schools
to be more well-resourced.
Therefore
, I believe that these incentives are acceptable.