Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people argue higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher industrial pollution, whereas others argue there are better ways to deal with it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people argue higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher industrial pollution, whereas others argue there are better ways to deal with it. 0xen
Industries provide employment but they also cause a great deal of pollution. Therefore, some people argue that the government should impose higher taxes on industries that cause more pollution. I do not quite agree with this view. Imposing higher taxes on polluting industries certainly seems like a good idea; however, if this measure is implemented, it will create more problems down the lane. To start with, companies may assume that they have a right to pollute as long as they are ready to pay the tax. Consequently, they will have no motivation to invest in greener technologies. Needless to say, pollution levels will get considerably worse within a few years. A better solution is to encourage companies to reduce the pollution they cause. The government can offer them incentives to invest in greener technologies. For example, the government should consider offering tax rebates to companies that reduce their pollution levels. This will encourage more and more companies to adopt eco-friendly technologies. The government must also make it mandatory for all businesses to comply with emission standards. It must ensure that industries have set up plants to treat their waste before allowing them to start their operations. The laws already exist in almost all countries but the problem is that they are rarely implemented. This is particularly true in the developing countries where corrupt officials collude with entrepreneurs and issue commencement certificates without checking whether adequate waste disposal systems are in place. Moving hazardous industries to uninhabited places may also help. To conclude, imposing higher tax on companies that cause more pollution is unlikely to solve the problem. Worse, this measure may exacerbate the situation. A better solution is to offer tax sops to companies that reduce their pollution levels.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Industries
provide employment
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
they
also
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cause
a great deal of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
.
Therefore
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
argue that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
should impose higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
taxes
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
industries
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cause
more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
. I do not quite
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with this view.

Imposing higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
taxes
on polluting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
industries
certainly
seems like a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
;
however
, if this measure
is implemented
, it will create more problems down the lane. To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
with,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
may assume that they have a right to pollute as long as they are ready to pay the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
.
Consequently
, they will have no motivation to invest in greener technologies. Needless to say,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
levels will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
considerably
worse within a few years.

A better solution is to encourage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
they
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cause
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
can offer them incentives to invest in greener technologies.
For example
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
should consider offering
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
rebates to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
levels. This will encourage more and more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
to adopt eco-friendly technologies. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
it mandatory for all businesses to comply with emission standards. It
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
ensure that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
industries
have set up plants to treat their waste
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
allowing them to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
their operations. The laws already exist in almost all countries
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
the problem is that they are rarely implemented. This is
particularly
true in the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
developing countries
where corrupt officials collude with entrepreneurs and issue commencement certificates without checking whether adequate waste disposal systems are in place. Moving hazardous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
industries
to uninhabited places may
also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
.

To conclude
, imposing higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cause
more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
is unlikely to solve the problem. Worse, this measure may exacerbate the situation. A better solution is to offer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
sops to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
levels.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people argue higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher industrial pollution, whereas others argue there are better ways to deal with it.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
289 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts