Many people believe that death penalty should be a part of the judicial system. But others have opinion that it must be banned. As for me, I think in the same way. I am sure that it is unnecessary to kill prisoners for their crimes and this type of judgment should be prohibited.
On the one hand, after incarceration government must support murders’ lives with the money from fax of nation as well as provide enough security resources to protect killers in jail. It seems injustice to protect, feed, buy different goods for murders and rubbers with the help of money of local society that may have been suffering by these prisoners. Moreover, it is rightfully to be killed if person committed violent crimes. Hence, justice will be served.
On the other hand, death penalty is unacceptable neither in different religions nor in a wide range of minds. Furthermore, a lot of judicial systems don’t work well and it may lead to unjust executions. Some of parts of this system won’t work for excellent result, they want only to end it quickly. For example, there was famous killer of children called Chikatilo in Russia, and before police caught him, three innocent people were convicted with the death penalty. In addition, staying in one room whole life without any opportunities to enter society or trying to make ends meet is more depressive than quick end of violent life.
To sum up, there are more cons than pros of death penalty and it is more harmful for killer to stay alive than to be death. As I have said, I am against the idea of adding this type of punishment into judgment systems due to humaneness.
Many
people
believe that death
penalty
should be a part of the judicial
system
.
But
others have opinion that it
must
be banned
. As for me, I
think
in the same way
. I am sure that it is unnecessary to kill prisoners for their crimes and this type of judgment should
be prohibited
.
On the one hand, after incarceration
government
must
support murders’
lives
with the money from fax of nation
as well
as provide
enough
security resources to protect killers in jail. It seems injustice to protect, feed,
buy
different
goods
for murders and rubbers with the
help
of money of local society that may have been suffering by these prisoners.
Moreover
, it is
rightfully
to
be killed
if person committed violent crimes.
Hence
, justice will
be served
.
On the other hand
, death
penalty
is unacceptable neither in
different
religions nor in a wide range of minds.
Furthermore
,
a lot of
judicial
systems
don’t work well and it may lead to unjust executions.
Some of parts
of this
system
won’t work for excellent result, they want
only
to
end
it
quickly
.
For example
, there was
famous
killer of children called
Chikatilo
in Russia, and
before
police caught him, three innocent
people
were convicted
with the death
penalty
.
In addition
, staying in one room whole life without any opportunities to enter society or trying to
make
ends
meet
is more depressive than quick
end
of violent life.
To sum up, there are more cons than pros of death
penalty
and it is more harmful for killer to stay alive than to be death. As I have said, I am against the
idea
of adding this type of punishment into judgment
systems
due to humaneness.