The proposition to tax foods containing sugar is generally viable. However, the countries that
might implement this tax must consider the negative impacts on their food based economy.
While childhood obesity is indeed a grave issue, the cultural and economic repercussions of
such a decision must be taken into account.
Imagine that this recommendation was put into effect. Low to medium income families, who
have limited budgets for food, would have to consume less products containing sugar. These
households would consume a larger proportion of whole foods, such as fruits and vegetables.
Similarly, children might not be able to afford chocolate, candy and baked goods with their
allowance. Ideally, a long term benefit of this proposal would be a drastic change in the eating
habits of most families; children would not have easy access to sugary foods, thus breaking the
cycle of dependence on sugar.
On the other hand, the companies producing foods with sugar might suffer economically, which
in turn affects the nation’s cultural influence. Many countries, including France, Belgium and
Switzerland, benefit greatly from their flourishing sugar trade to appeal to their domestic and
international clientele. Bakeries, confectionaries, cafes, and even supermarkets depend on the
high demand for sugary goods. A decrease in demand might result in many workers losing their
jobs.
In conclusion, the countries must determine whether the health benefits to children outweigh the
cultural and economic repercussions. If implemented, the nations would prioritise the future
health of their children over their longstanding food culture.
The proposition to tax
foods
containing
sugar
is
generally
viable.
However
, the countries that
might implement this tax
must
consider the
negative
impacts on their
food
based economy.
While childhood obesity is
indeed
a grave issue, the cultural and economic repercussions of
such a decision
must
be taken
into account.
Imagine that this recommendation
was put
into effect. Low to medium income families, who
have limited budgets for
food
, would
have to
consume
less
products containing
sugar
. These
households would consume a larger proportion of whole
foods
, such as fruits and vegetables.
Similarly
,
children
might not be able to afford chocolate, candy and baked
goods
with their
allowance.
Ideally
, a long term benefit of this proposal would be a drastic
change
in the eating
habits of most families;
children
would not have easy access to sugary
foods
,
thus
breaking the
cycle of dependence on sugar.
On the other hand
, the
companies
producing
foods
with
sugar
might suffer
economically
, which
in turn affects the nation’s cultural influence.
Many
countries, including France, Belgium and
Switzerland, benefit
greatly
from their flourishing
sugar
trade to appeal to their domestic and
international clientele. Bakeries, confectionaries,
cafes
, and even supermarkets depend on the
high demand for sugary
goods
. A decrease in demand might result in
many
workers losing their
jobs.
In conclusion
, the countries
must
determine whether the health benefits to
children
outweigh the
cultural and economic repercussions. If implemented, the nations would
prioritise
the future
health of their
children
over their longstanding
food
culture.