Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some corporations believe that the quality of multitasking is not needed in employment. However, reputation of multitasking quality is gaining in the world.

Some corporations believe that the quality of multitasking is not needed in employment. However, reputation of multitasking quality is gaining in the world. Lr9QK

Multitasking: is it a boon or a bane? Though the term multitasking has become much more prevalent in last twenty years, it is actually not an entirely new sensation. Corporations across the world focus only on the bottom line so as to maximize shareholder wealth. They therefore expect from an employee to do multiple jobs at one go, and make him stretch his ability. I believe that it is absolutely unwarranted. There is a widespread assumption about employees' multitasking skill that it is useful for corporations. It is a kind of a snake oil symposium. At face value, it looks a boon, but the analysis and facts show otherwise. Multitasking causes loss of productivity, switching between cognitive tasks costs time and money both. Furthermore, inattention causes more mistakes, anxiety; prevents a critical innovation. The human brain, unlike computers, takes around twenty five minutes to return to the original task where it was left off. This results into Continuous Partial Attention (CPA) which can be termed as an illness. Ergo, it nowhere serves the purpose for corporations. There are apparent benefits associated with multitasking, whether it is perceived or real. Firstly, it helps the doer feel a sense of accomplishing more in a shorter pace, At the same point, the employee becomes more marketable compared to his peers. Secondly, employees feel confident in writing this attainment on their resumes, too. They, unarguably, believe that no stage is wasted away, and it also helps them kill boredom. Headhunters capitalize on such employees' so called quality and misconception, and up their expectations for them to complete many jobs in a day. This habit of some corporations becomes a crutch forever. Invariably. Both corporations and employees believe that multitasking is a boon. In my final analysis, the demerits associated with multitasking greatly outweigh its merits. On the other hand, mono-tasking is a more established and proven method of working.

Multitasking: is it a boon or a bane? Though the term multitasking has become much more prevalent in last twenty years, it is actually not an entirely
 new sensation. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbusinesscompanypartnershipsocietyenterpriseassociation
Corporations
 across the world focus This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 on the bottom line 'So as to' expresses purpose and is used in formal texts. Consider using "to"to
so as to
 maximize shareholder wealth. They therefore
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :anticipate
expect
 from an You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employee
 to do multiple jobs at one go, and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 him stretch his ability. I believe that it is absolutely
 unwarranted.

There is a widespread assumption about employees' multitasking This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :proficiency
skill
 that it is useful for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbusinesscompanypartnershipsocietyenterpriseassociation
corporations
. It is a If 'kind' is a classification term, 'a' is not necessary. Use "kind of". (The phrases 'kind of' and 'sort of' are informal if they mean 'to some extent'.)kind of
kind of a
 snake oil symposium. At face value, it looks a boon, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 the analysis and facts This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstrateportrayindicatedisplay
show
otherwise
. Multitasking causes loss of productivity, switching between cognitive tasks costs time and money both. Furthermore
, inattention causes more mistakes, anxiety; This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :precludes
prevents
 a critical innovation. The human brain, unlike computers, takes around This word is normally spelled with hyphen.twenty-five
twenty five
 minutes to return to the original task where it was This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :departed
left
 off. This results into Continuous Partial Attention (CPA) which can be termed
 as an illness. Ergo, it nowhere serves the purpose for corporations.

There are apparent benefits associated with multitasking, whether it is perceived
 or real. Firstly
, it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assists
helps
 the doer feel a sense of accomplishing more in a shorter pace, At the same point, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employee
 becomes more marketable compared to his peers. Secondly
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
 feel confident in writing this attainment on their resumes, too. They, unarguably
, believe that no stage is wasted
 away, and it also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assists
helps
 them kill boredom. Headhunters capitalize on such employees' It seems that a hyphen is missing.so-called
so called
 quality and misconception, and up their expectations for them to complete This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 jobs in a day. This habit of This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbusinesscompanypartnershipsocietyenterpriseassociation
corporations
 becomes a crutch forever. Invariably
. Both You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbusinesscompanypartnershipsocietyenterpriseassociation
corporations
 and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
 believe that multitasking is a boon.

In my final analysis, the demerits associated with multitasking greatly
 outweigh its merits. On the other hand
, mono-tasking is a more established and proven method of working. 