In contemporary era, university pupils should study subjects of their own choices or should they be obliged to study career oriented technology and science major subjects is a widely debated issue. A number of people reckon that students will retain their freedom to study subjects which they are fascinated; whilst others accord that they ought to involved in major that will be extremely helped in the future. This essay delves both the views and expresses my opinion.
To embark upon, a university is the highest citadel for education in a country and it is crucial the next adept generation who would lead the country. For example, the experts tend to say “the student at university level shall be given certain freedom while picking majors they study in and there shall not be any predefined syllabus”. Furthermore, they opine that forcing them to study a plethora of the latest subjects for the future employment would prepare them become workers for offices, not leaders for the country, however, they also express that letting them study a wide range of subjects would make them far more knowledgeable. Thus, not solely blindly run for their career.
On the flip side, the university authority must consider the consequences of letting pupils choose their subjects. For example, a recent study shows that predefined syllabus-bound a pupil study regularly and prepares for the exam while freedom to take any subject dramatically increases the number of dropout pupil. Meanwhile, this is an alarming issue and this is why the university authority needs to think twice prior to implementing the policy.
In compendium, I pen down by retreating that certain freedom while picking subjects in university level is extremely helpful for the overall development and knowledge enhancement of pupil. I would like to ingeminate that an absolute freedom would make the outcome worse.
In contemporary era,
university
pupils
should
study
subjects
of their
own
choices or should they
be obliged
to
study
career oriented technology and science major
subjects
is a
widely
debated issue. A number of
people
reckon that students will retain their
freedom
to
study
subjects
which they
are fascinated
; whilst others accord that they ought to involved in major that will be
extremely
helped
in the future. This essay delves both the views and expresses my opinion.
To embark upon, a
university
is the highest citadel for education in a country and it is crucial the
next
adept generation who would lead the country.
For example
, the experts tend to say “the student at
university
level shall be
given
certain
freedom
while picking majors they
study
in and there shall not be any predefined syllabus”.
Furthermore
, they opine that forcing them to
study
a plethora of the latest
subjects
for the future employment would prepare them become workers for offices, not leaders for the country,
however
, they
also
express that letting them
study
a wide range of
subjects
would
make
them far more knowledgeable.
Thus
, not
solely
blindly
run for their career.
On the flip side, the
university
authority
must
consider the consequences of letting
pupils
choose their
subjects
.
For example
, a recent
study
shows
that predefined syllabus-bound a
pupil
study
regularly
and prepares for the exam while
freedom
to take any
subject
dramatically
increases the number of dropout
pupil
. Meanwhile, this is an alarming issue and this is why the
university
authority needs to
think
twice prior to implementing the policy.
In compendium, I pen down by retreating that certain
freedom
while picking
subjects
in
university
level is
extremely
helpful for the
overall
development and knowledge enhancement of
pupil
. I would like to
ingeminate
that an absolute
freedom
would
make
the outcome worse.