In the modern world, it is highly debatable whether the existing preventive actions are enough to reduce the rate of crime. While some argue that the situation is stable and no more activities are required, other people claim that there are still areas to improve. The following essay will examine both these statements, and I will also explain why I believe the second opinion is a valid one.
To begin with, the development of information technologies helps to improve drastically the situation with criminal activities all over the world. To put it differently, nowadays there is a variety of gadgets, which are widely used to proactively monitor delinquent behaviours, and many of them serve as a deterrent for people to commit a crime. To illustrate this, video cameras on roads are set in a multitude of countries, so drivers usually do not exceed the speed because they understand that it will be recorded. As a result, the rate of car accidents has been significantly reduced in many areas, as technologies keep people from wrong-doings.
On the other hand, when it comes to preventive actions to stop criminal activities, there are still a few social projects, which are aimed to keep humans from the justice system. In other words, I strongly believe that governments should pay more attention to social organisations, which work with difficult people who can be treated as potential offenders. As a case in point, some people can not tackle their financial complications, so the only way for them to survive is to commit a crime, and state organisations should shift their emphasis to such groups of citizens. Thus, regular counselling sessions with these humans, as well as valid financial support will potentially be a key to stop future offendings.
In conclusion, we are all too familiar with the social dilemma regarding the lever of crime nowadays. Whereas some state that governments and non-state organisations can tackle this problem effectively, I totally believe that there are many strong tools and approaches which should be taken into consideration. Had governments altered their attitude to social activities to support people in their difficult days, it would have been drastically improved the situation with criminals. 
In the modern world, it is  
highly
 debatable whether the existing preventive actions are  
enough
 to  
reduce
 the rate of  
crime
. While  
some
 argue that the situation is stable and no more  
activities
  are required
, other  
people
 claim that there are  
still
 areas to  
improve
. The following essay will examine both these statements, and I will  
also
  explain
 why I believe the second opinion is a valid one.
To  
begin
 with, the development of information technologies  
helps
 to  
improve
  drastically
 the situation with criminal  
activities
 all over the world. To put it  
differently
, nowadays there is a variety of gadgets, which are  
widely
  used
 to  
proactively
 monitor delinquent  
behaviours
, and  
many
 of them serve as a deterrent for  
people
 to commit a  
crime
.  
To
 illustrate this, video cameras on roads  
are set
 in a multitude of countries,  
so
 drivers  
usually
 do not exceed the speed  
because
 they understand that it will  
be recorded
.  
As a result
, the rate of car accidents has been  
significantly
  reduced
 in  
many
 areas, as technologies  
keep
  people
 from  
wrong
-doings. 
On the other hand
, when it  
comes
 to preventive actions to  
stop
 criminal  
activities
, there are  
still
 a few  
social
 projects, which  
are aimed
 to  
keep
 humans from the justice system.  
In other words
, I  
strongly
 believe that  
governments
 should pay more attention to  
social
  organisations
, which work with difficult  
people
 who can  
be treated
 as potential offenders. As a case in point,  
some
  people
 can not tackle their financial complications,  
so
 the  
only
 way for them to survive is to commit a  
crime
, and state  
organisations
 should shift their emphasis to such groups of citizens.  
Thus
, regular counselling sessions with these humans,  
as well
 as valid financial support will  
potentially
 be a key to  
stop
 future  
offendings
. 
In conclusion
, we are all too familiar with the  
social
 dilemma regarding the lever of  
crime
 nowadays. Whereas  
some
 state that  
governments
 and non-state  
organisations
 can tackle this problem  
effectively
, I  
totally
 believe that there are  
many
 strong tools and approaches which should  
be taken
 into consideration. Had  
governments
 altered their attitude to  
social
  activities
 to support  
people
 in their difficult days, it would have been  
drastically
  improved
 the situation with criminals.