Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

smoking in public spots has to be prohibited do you agree or disagree

smoking in public spots has to be prohibited roD2

It is believed by some that smoking in public spots has to be prohibited by the responsible officials. I strongly agree because smoking in public can pose a threat to the health of bystanders, but at the same time, designated locations could be created for those who cannot stop smoking. More than a billion people around the world smoke regularly and that is a growing concern for the governments. Passive smoking is the largest issue in this context since when a person smokes, they do not only harm themselves but those around them as well. In most dramatic circumstances, older smokers can smoke around children’s playgrounds, which can have dire consequences. Thus, when it comes to playgrounds and places as such, it would be a better idea to ban smoking. On the other hand, smoking is not the only unhealthy habit people may have and prohibiting tobacco could make the lives of smokers stressful. Therefore, a rational decision here could be introducing separate places for those who prefer smoking, even in public. Many restaurants and even bus stops in some countries already have such a practice. This means that non-smokers and those who are addicted can be in divided sections where they do not bother one another. To sum up, even though separate areas could be created for smokers. I would still support the idea of a full ban when it is possible in the future. Also, it would be much more effective if governments thought of better substitutes for tobacco.

It is believed
 by This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 in public spots This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:oughts to
has to
be prohibited
 by the responsible officials. I strongly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 in public can pose a threat to the health of bystanders, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 at the same time, designated locations could be created
 for those who cannot This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :terminateceasediscontinue
stop
 smoking.

More than a billion This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 around the world smoke regularly
 and that is
 a growing concern for the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
governments
. Passive You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 is the largest issue in this context since when a person smokes, they do not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 harm themselves This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 those around them as well
. In most dramatic circumstances, older smokers can smoke around children’s playgrounds, which can have dire consequences. Thus
, when it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :approachesarrives
comes
 to playgrounds and places as such, it would be a better This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
 to ban smoking.

On the other hand
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 is not the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 unhealthy habit This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 may have and prohibiting tobacco could This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
 of smokers stressful. Therefore
, a rational decision here could be introducing separate places for those who prefer You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
, even in public. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
Many
 restaurants and even bus This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :terminateceasesdiscontinues
stops
 in This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 countries already have such a practice. This means that non-smokers and those who are addicted
 can be in divided sections where they do not bother one another.

To sum up, even though
 separate areas could be created
 for smokers. I would still
 support the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
 of a full ban when it is possible in the future. Also
, it would be much more effective if This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
governments
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonedassumedbelievedconsidered
thought
 of better substitutes for tobacco. 