Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

should weathy nations assist poor nations or the government of weaker countries have to protect their citizens?

should weathy nations assist poor nations or the government of weaker countries have to protect their citizens? NymxW
People have different views about whether should the wealthier countries are required to help the poorer ones or the government of poor countries are in charge of supporting their citizens. Although it can be argued that the poorer nations have to support themselves, I believe that the wealthier countries should assist by sharing food and education. On the one hand, it is argued by some that the government in poor countries has to look after their dwellers. Firstly, helping from the government is always faster and easier to get. The shipping time holds the key to arduous circumstances. If goods are sent from abroad, it would be too late and then it becomes useless. Secondly, receiving expresses a weak country, and maybe after a gift is a debt that poorer nations have to pay. Vietnam used to be dependent on America as a result of weak circumstances, for example. Vietnam was saved by the USA but losing freedom. On the other hand, I would side with those who believe that stronger nations share a part of wealth and resources. Supporting the weaker nations express the solidarity among human being and enhances the popularity which helps them to be wealthier and wealthier. With the spread of coronavirus in the world, some rich countries created many kinds of vaccinations which are appreciated by the experts to provide for countries that are not able to cope with the pandemic, for example. In conclusion, while it is said that the poor nations must take care of themselves, I completely agree with those who believe that it is necessary for rich countries to support poorer ones in education, food, and essentials that not only desperate assistance but also a strong bond between nations.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
People
have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
views about whether should the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wealthier
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
are required
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poorer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ones
or the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
of poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
are in charge of supporting their citizens. Although it can
be argued
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poorer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
support themselves, I believe that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wealthier
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
should assist by sharing food and education.

On the one hand, it
is argued
by
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
that the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
in poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
has to
look after their dwellers.
Firstly
, helping from the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
is always faster and easier to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
. The shipping time holds the key to arduous circumstances. If
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sent
from abroad, it would be too late and then it becomes useless.
Secondly
, receiving expresses a weak
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
, and maybe after a gift is a debt that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poorer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
pay. Vietnam
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
to be dependent on America
as a result
of weak circumstances,
for example
. Vietnam
was saved
by the USA
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
losing freedom.

On the other hand
, I would side with those who believe that stronger
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
share a part of wealth and resources. Supporting the weaker
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
express the solidarity among human being and enhances the popularity which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
them to be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wealthier
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wealthier
. With the spread of coronavirus in the world,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
rich
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
created
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
kinds of vaccinations which
are appreciated
by the experts to provide for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
that are not able to cope with the pandemic,
for example
.

In conclusion
, while it
is said
that the poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
take care of themselves, I completely
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with those who believe that it is necessary for rich
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
to support
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poorer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ones
in education, food, and essentials that not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
desperate assistance
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
a strong bond between
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay should weathy nations assist poor nations or the government of weaker countries have to protect their citizens?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
288 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts